154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10974800)
1. What's half a lung worth? Civil jurors' accounts of their award decision making.
Mott NL; Hans VP; Simpson L
Law Hum Behav; 2000 Aug; 24(4):401-19. PubMed ID: 10974800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The power of meaningful numbers: Attorney guidance and jury deliberation improve the reliability and gist validity of damage awards.
Reed K; Hans VP; Rotenstein V; Helm RK; Rodriguez A; McKendall P; Reyna VF
Law Hum Behav; 2024 Apr; 48(2):83-103. PubMed ID: 38602803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of jury instructions on the fusion of liability and compensatory damages.
Wissler RL; Rector KA; Saks MJ
Law Hum Behav; 2001 Apr; 25(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 11419378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Jurors' cognitive depletion and performance during jury deliberation as a function of jury diversity and defendant race.
Peter-Hagene L
Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):232-249. PubMed ID: 31120276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Jurors' use of standards of proof in decisions about punitive damages.
Woody WD; Greene E
Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(6):856-72. PubMed ID: 22829456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of defendant conduct on jury damage awards.
Greene E; Johns M; Smith A
J Appl Psychol; 2001 Apr; 86(2):228-37. PubMed ID: 11393436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conduct and its consequences: attempts at debiasing jury judgments.
Smith AC; Greene E
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):505-26. PubMed ID: 16254740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Separating compensatory and punitive damage award decisions by trial bifurcation.
Shea Adams CM; Bourgeois MJ
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16729206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Damage awards and jurors' responsibility ascriptions in medical versus automobile negligence cases.
Vidmar N; Lee J; Cohen E; Stewart A
Behav Sci Law; 1994; 12(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 10150702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of limiting punitive damage awards.
Greene E; Coon D; Bornstein B
Law Hum Behav; 2001 Jun; 25(3):217-34. PubMed ID: 11480801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reaction of mock jurors to testimony of a court appointed expert.
Cooper J; Hall J
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 11180418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The consolidation of plaintiffs: the effects of number of plaintiffs on jurors' liability decisions, damage awards, and cognitive processing of evidence.
Horowitz IA; Bordens KS
J Appl Psychol; 2000 Dec; 85(6):909-18. PubMed ID: 11125655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of liability information, severity of injury, and attitudes toward vengeance on damage awards.
Woody WD
Psychol Rep; 2008 Feb; 102(1):239-58. PubMed ID: 18481684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases.
Margoni F; Brown TR
Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105442. PubMed ID: 36996604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Jurors' and Judges' Evaluation of Defendants with Autism and the Impact on Sentencing: A Systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Review of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Courtroom.
Allely CS; Cooper P
J Law Med; 2017 Nov; 25(1):105-123. PubMed ID: 29978627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring damages for lost enjoyment of life: the view from the bench and the jury box.
Poser S; Bornstein BH; McGorty EK
Law Hum Behav; 2003 Feb; 27(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 12647467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Be careful what you ask for: the effect of anchors on personal injury damages awards.
Marti MW; Wissler RL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Jun; 6(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 10937314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Malpractice insurance rates reach boiling point. Physicians burned by lawyers, lawsuits and jury awards.
Weber DO
Physician Exec; 2002; 28(2):12-4. PubMed ID: 11957403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
