140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10974801)
1. Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations.
Haegerich TM; Bottoms BL
Law Hum Behav; 2000 Aug; 24(4):421-48. PubMed ID: 10974801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations.
Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jul; 38(13-14):7964-7989. PubMed ID: 36762531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Jurors' reactions to satanic ritual abuse allegations.
Bottoms BL; Diviak KR; Davis SL
Child Abuse Negl; 1997 Sep; 21(9):845-59. PubMed ID: 9298262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of defendant sexual orientation on jurors' perceptions of child sexual assault.
Wiley TR; Bottoms BL
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 18404363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Jurors' perceptions of adolescent sexual assault victims who have intellectual disabilities.
Bottoms BL; Nysse-Carris KL; Harris T; Tyda K
Law Hum Behav; 2003 Apr; 27(2):205-27. PubMed ID: 12733422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case.
Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Where There's Smoke, There's Fire: the Effect of Truncated Testimony on Juror Decision-making.
Anderson L; Gross J; Sonne T; Zajac R; Hayne H
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):200-17. PubMed ID: 26879737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making.
Sheahan CL; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):938-956. PubMed ID: 29294918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Explaining gender differences in jurors' reactions to child sexual assault cases.
Bottoms BL; Peter-Hagene LC; Stevenson MC; Wiley TR; Mitchell TS; Goodman GS
Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):789-812. PubMed ID: 25430669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Legal Perceptions of Lesbian Intimate Partner Violence.
Wasarhaley NE; Lynch KR; Golding JM; Renzetti CM
J Interpers Violence; 2017 Mar; 32(5):635-658. PubMed ID: 25990382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the Credibility of Child Sexual Assault Victims in Court: The Impact of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner.
Golding JM; Wasarhaley NE; Lynch KR; Lippert A; Magyarics CL
Behav Sci Law; 2015 Aug; 33(4):493-507. PubMed ID: 26294384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors' Views of Teacher-Student Sexual Contact.
Anderson A; Wingrove T; Fox P; McLean K; Styer E
J Interpers Violence; 2018 May; 33(9):1449-1471. PubMed ID: 26621035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
