These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10974804)

  • 1. The Millon clinical inventories, research critical of their forensic application, and Daubert criteria.
    Dyer FJ; McCann JT
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Aug; 24(4):487-97. PubMed ID: 10974804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory for Axis II disorders: does it meet the Daubert standard?
    Rogers R; Salekin RT; Sewell KW
    Law Hum Behav; 1999 Aug; 23(4):425-43. PubMed ID: 10439726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence and treatment of personality disorders in Dutch forensic mental health services.
    de Ruiter C; Trestman RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 17389350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testimony based on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory: review, commentary, and guidelines.
    Craig RJ
    J Pers Assess; 1999 Oct; 73(2):290-304. PubMed ID: 10624006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AAPL Practice Guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense.
    American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL)
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(4 Suppl):S3-S76. PubMed ID: 25492121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Malingering addendum.
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2001; 25(5):716-8. PubMed ID: 11729563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognizing and handling problems of incompetent deaf defendants charged with serious offenses.
    Vernon M; Raifman LJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1997; 20(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 9347398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The MCMI-III and the Daubert standard: separating rhetoric from reality.
    Rogers R; Salekin RT; Sewell KW
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Aug; 24(4):501-6. PubMed ID: 10974806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personality disorders and criminal responsibility: a second opinion.
    Rudnick A; Levy A
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(4):409-20. PubMed ID: 7890474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Concepts in the assessment of "other severe psychological deviance"].
    Kröber HL
    Nervenarzt; 1995 Jul; 66(7):532-41. PubMed ID: 7675154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Assessment of personality disorders with the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI-II) in a forensic sample].
    Winberg Nodal M; Vilalta Suárez RJ
    Psicothema; 2009 Nov; 21(4):610-4. PubMed ID: 19861107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accountability and psychiatric disorders: how do forensic psychiatric professionals think?
    Höglund P; Levander S; Anckarsäter H; Radovic S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(6):355-61. PubMed ID: 19811835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hendricks v. People: forcing the insanity defense on an unwilling defendant.
    Miller RD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 12108569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MCMI profiles of pretrial defendants.
    McKee GR; Klohn LS
    Psychol Rep; 1994 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1346. PubMed ID: 8084955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forensic mental health clinical evaluation: an analysis of interstate and intersystemic differences.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL; Hawk G
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Aug; 21(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 9335195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ethical framework for assessments of criminal responsibility: applying Susan Wolf's account of sanity to forensic psychiatry.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 22627087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Personality disorders in a Dutch forensic psychiatric sample: convergence of interview and self-report measures.
    de Ruiter C; Greeven PG
    J Pers Disord; 2000; 14(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 10897466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The hidden effects of Montana's "abolition" of the insanity defense.
    Callahan LA; Robbins PC; Steadman HJ; Morrissey JP
    Psychiatr Q; 1995; 66(2):103-17. PubMed ID: 7652094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Law & psychiatry: imposed insanity defenses and political crimes.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2013 Jan; 64(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 23280453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recent interview-based measures of competency to stand trial: a critical review augmented with research data.
    Rogers R; Grandjean N; Tillbrook CE; Vitacco MJ; Sewell KW
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(4):503-18. PubMed ID: 11568958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.