These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10976122)

  • 1. Meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2000 Sep; 16(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 10976122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Richards DP
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Jan; 20(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 14716278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Biodegradable meniscus fixations: a comparative biomechanical study].
    Seil R; Rupp S; Jurecka C; Georg T; Kohn D
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Feb; 89(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 12610434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A biomechanical comparison of the Mitek RapidLoc, Mitek Meniscal repair system, clearfix screws and vertical PDS and Ti-Cron sutures.
    Naqui SZ; Thiryayi WA; Hopgood P; Ryan WG
    Knee; 2006 Mar; 13(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 16338137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical testing of new meniscal repair techniques containing ultra high-molecular weight polyethylene suture.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Schroeder FA; Aziz-Jacobo J; Sutker MJ
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Sep; 25(9):959-67. PubMed ID: 19732633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical testing of suture-based meniscal repair devices containing ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene suture: update 2011.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Bava ED; Drew OR
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Jun; 28(6):827-34. PubMed ID: 22317797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pull-out and shear failure strengths of arthroscopic meniscal repair systems.
    Fisher SR; Markel DC; Koman JD; Atkinson TS
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Sep; 10(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 12355304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures.
    Chang HC; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Burden R
    Am J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1846-52. PubMed ID: 16157854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trinion meniscal screw.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Jun; 22(6):685.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16762717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Failure strength of repair devices versus meniscus suturing techniques.
    Aşík M; Sener N
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Jan; 10(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11819017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biomechanical evaluation of all-inside 2-stitch meniscal repair devices with matched inside-out suture repair.
    Ramappa AJ; Chen A; Hertz B; Wexler M; Grimaldi Bournissaint L; DeAngelis JP; Nazarian A
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jan; 42(1):194-9. PubMed ID: 24114752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical Comparison of Vertical Mattress and Cross-stitch Suture Techniques and Single- and Double-Row Configurations for the Treatment of Bucket-Handle Medial Meniscal Tears.
    Nakama GY; Kaleka CC; Franciozi CE; Astur DC; Debieux P; Krob JJ; Aman ZS; Kemler BR; Storaci HW; Dornan GJ; Cohen M; LaPrade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Apr; 47(5):1194-1202. PubMed ID: 30897004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fixation strength of meniscal repair devices.
    Bellemans J; Vandenneucker H; Labey L; Van Audekercke R
    Knee; 2002 Feb; 9(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 11830375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cyclic joint loading can affect the initial stability of meniscal fixation implants.
    Dürselen L; Schneider J; Galler M; Claes LE; Bauer G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Jan; 18(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 12527246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medial Meniscal Root Avulsion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Different Repair Constructs.
    Mitchell R; Pitts R; Kim YM; Matava MJ
    Arthroscopy; 2016 Jan; 32(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 26422709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategies for repair of radial tears close to the meniscal rim--biomechanical analysis with a cyclic loading protocol.
    Herbort M; Siam S; Lenschow S; Petersen W; Zantop T
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Nov; 38(11):2281-7. PubMed ID: 20889985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Biomechanical Performance of the Latest All-Inside Meniscal Repair Devices.
    Barber FA; Howard MS; Ashraf W; Spenciner DB
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Dec; 36(12):3001-3007. PubMed ID: 32315765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tensile fixation strengths of absorbable meniscal repair devices as a function of hydrolysis time. An in vitro experimental study.
    Arnoczky SP; Lavagnino M
    Am J Sports Med; 2001; 29(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 11292034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical comparison of meniscal repair devices with mattress suture devices in vitro.
    Aros BC; Pedroza A; Vasileff WK; Litsky AS; Flanigan DC
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2010 Nov; 18(11):1594-8. PubMed ID: 20532866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repair of peripheral vertical meniscus lesions in porcine menisci: in vitro biomechanical testing of 3 different meniscus repair devices.
    Lee YH; Nyland J; Burden R; Caborn DN
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1074-81. PubMed ID: 23475943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.