These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A mixed analog/digital chaotic neuro-computer system for quadratic assignment problems. Horio Y; Ikeguchi T; Aihara K Neural Netw; 2005; 18(5-6):505-13. PubMed ID: 16087316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization via intermittency with a self-organizing neural network. Kwok T; Smith KA Neural Comput; 2005 Nov; 17(11):2454-81. PubMed ID: 16156935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-Objectivising Combinatorial Optimisation Problems by Means of Elementary Landscape Decompositions. Ceberio J; Calvo B; Mendiburu A; Lozano JA Evol Comput; 2019; 27(2):291-311. PubMed ID: 29446983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust pole assignment for synthesizing feedback control systems using recurrent neural networks. Le X; Wang J IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2014 Feb; 25(2):383-93. PubMed ID: 24807036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Biogeography-Based Optimization Algorithm Hybridized with Tabu Search for the Quadratic Assignment Problem. Lim WL; Wibowo A; Desa MI; Haron H Comput Intell Neurosci; 2016; 2016():5803893. PubMed ID: 26819585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A hybrid Hopfield network-genetic algorithm approach for the terminal assignment problem. Salcedo-Sanz S; Yao X IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2004 Dec; 34(6):2343-53. PubMed ID: 15619934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New learning automata based algorithms for adaptation of backpropagation algorithm parameters. Meybodi MR; Beigy H Int J Neural Syst; 2002 Feb; 12(1):45-67. PubMed ID: 11852444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Constrained neural approaches to quadratic assignment problems. Ishii S; Sato M Neural Netw; 1998 Aug; 11(6):1073-1082. PubMed ID: 12662776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Singular perturbation analysis of competitive neural networks with different time scales. Meyer-Bäse A; Ohl F; Scheich H Neural Comput; 1996 Nov; 8(8):1731-42. PubMed ID: 8888615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Constraint satisfaction problems and neural networks: A statistical physics perspective. Mézard M; Mora T J Physiol Paris; 2009; 103(1-2):107-13. PubMed ID: 19616623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptiveness in monotone pseudo-Boolean optimization and stochastic neural computation. Grossi G Int J Neural Syst; 2009 Aug; 19(4):241-52. PubMed ID: 19731398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Solving quadratic programming problems by delayed projection neural network. Yang Y; Cao J IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2006 Nov; 17(6):1630-4. PubMed ID: 17131675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Design of the inverse function delayed neural network for solving combinatorial optimization problems. Hayakawa Y; Nakajima K IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2010 Feb; 21(2):224-37. PubMed ID: 20007029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]