These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10978827)

  • 21. Effects of stimulus parameters on human evoked potentials to shifts in the lateralization of a noise.
    McEvoy LK; Picton TW; Champagne SC
    Audiology; 1991; 30(5):286-302. PubMed ID: 1793389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lateralization and detection of pulse trains with alternating interaural time delays.
    Balakrishnan U; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1605-16. PubMed ID: 12398466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The danger of using narrow-band noise maskers to measure "suppression".
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jun; 77(6):2137-41. PubMed ID: 4019900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prior stimulation and the masking-level difference.
    Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Sep; 78(3):901-7. PubMed ID: 4031260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal (phase and time) disparities in lateralization.
    Russolo M; Poli P
    Audiology; 1985; 24(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 4004645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure.
    Cokely JA; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1331-9. PubMed ID: 2030220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of broadband noise on the precedence effect.
    Chiang YC; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Nov; 104(5):3039-47. PubMed ID: 9821348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of visual information on auditory lateralization.
    Saetrevik B
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Aug; 51(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 20497397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sensitivity to interaural intensitive disparities: listeners' use of potential cues.
    Bernstein LR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3156-60. PubMed ID: 15237839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving the detectability of a brief tone in noise using forward and backward masker fringes: monotic and dichotic presentations.
    Kidd G; Wright BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):962-7. PubMed ID: 8132910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reducing informational masking by sound segregation.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Deliwala PS; Woods WS; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3475-80. PubMed ID: 8046139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cortical representation of the combination of monaural and binaural unmasking.
    Uppenkamp S; Uhlig CH; Verhey JL
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():435-42. PubMed ID: 23716250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Masking-level differences in the elderly: a comparison of antiphasic and time-delay dichotic conditions.
    Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1410-22. PubMed ID: 1787722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dichotic pitch: a new stimulus distinguishes normal and dyslexic auditory function.
    Dougherty RF; Cynader MS; Bjornson BH; Edgell D; Giaschi DE
    Neuroreport; 1998 Sep; 9(13):3001-5. PubMed ID: 9804305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Onset dominance in lateralization.
    Freyman RL; Zurek PM; Balakrishnan U; Chiang YC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1649-59. PubMed ID: 9069632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physiological studies of the precedence effect in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Correlates of psychophysics.
    Litovsky RY; Yin TC
    J Neurophysiol; 1998 Sep; 80(3):1285-301. PubMed ID: 9744939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Some aspects of the lateralization of echoed sound in man. II. The role of the stimulus spectrum.
    Tollin DJ; Henning GB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Feb; 105(2 Pt 1):838-49. PubMed ID: 9972569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.