BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10978838)

  • 1. Sound conditioning reduces noise-induced permanent threshold shift in mice.
    Yoshida N; Liberman MC
    Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 148(1-2):213-9. PubMed ID: 10978838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Morphological and functional preservation of the outer hair cells from noise trauma by sound conditioning.
    Canlon B; Fransson A
    Hear Res; 1995 Apr; 84(1-2):112-24. PubMed ID: 7642444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporary and permanent noise-induced changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Vázquez AE; Luebke AE; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 156(1-2):31-43. PubMed ID: 11377880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions study of the noise-induced toughening effect in rats.
    Sánchez Fernandez JM; Martínez Ibargüen A; Orbegozo Etxebarría E; Sánchez Del Rey A; Santaolalla Montoya F
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 12701731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term sound conditioning enhances cochlear sensitivity.
    Kujawa SG; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 Aug; 82(2):863-73. PubMed ID: 10444683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of sound-conditioning on noise-induced susceptibility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Luebke AE; Stagner BB; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 26233006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating cochlear function and the effects of noise exposure in the B6.CAST+Ahl mouse with distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Vázquez AE; Jimenez AM; Martin GK; Luebke AE; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15276680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acquired resistance to acoustic trauma by sound conditioning is primarily mediated by changes restricted to the cochlea, not by systemic responses.
    Yamasoba T; Dolan DF; Miller JM
    Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):31-40. PubMed ID: 9925014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic injury in mice: 129/SvEv is exceptionally resistant to noise-induced hearing loss.
    Yoshida N; Hequembourg SJ; Atencio CA; Rosowski JJ; Liberman MC
    Hear Res; 2000 Mar; 141(1-2):97-106. PubMed ID: 10713498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing noise damage by using a mid-frequency sound conditioning stimulus.
    Canlon B; Fransson A
    Neuroreport; 1998 Jan; 9(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 9507967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of sound preconditioning on hearing loss from low or middle-frequency noise exposure.
    Liu YG; He YJ; Li DD; Zheng SX; Niu CM
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2000 Oct; 13(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 11894866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protection against noise trauma by sound conditioning.
    Canlon B
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 Apr; 76(4):248-50, 253-5. PubMed ID: 9127524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift.
    Nordmann AS; Bohne BA; Harding GW
    Hear Res; 2000 Jan; 139(1-2):13-30. PubMed ID: 10601709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conditioning-induced protection from impulse noise in female and male chinchillas.
    McFadden SL; Zheng XY; Ding DL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2162-8. PubMed ID: 10790042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conditioning-related protection from acoustic injury: effects of chronic deefferentation and sham surgery.
    Kujawa SG; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Dec; 78(6):3095-106. PubMed ID: 9405529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditioning the auditory system with continuous vs. interrupted noise of equal acoustic energy: is either exposure more protective?
    Skellett RA; Cullen JK; Fallon M; Bobbin RP
    Hear Res; 1998 Feb; 116(1-2):21-32. PubMed ID: 9508025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Mice: Effects of High and Low Levels of Noise Trauma in CBA Mice.
    Amanipour RM; Zhu X; Duvey G; Celanire S; Walton JP; Frisina RD
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():1210-1213. PubMed ID: 30440607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protection against acoustic trauma by forward and backward sound conditioning.
    Niu X; Tahera Y; Canlon B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 15316199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of repeated daily noise exposure on sound-conditioned and unconditioned guinea pigs.
    Dagli S; Canlon B
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):39-46. PubMed ID: 9119765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heat stress and protection from permanent acoustic injury in mice.
    Yoshida N; Kristiansen A; Liberman MC
    J Neurosci; 1999 Nov; 19(22):10116-24. PubMed ID: 10559419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.