These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10981604)

  • 1. An improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potential.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 10981604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra-operative recordings of electrically evoked auditory nerve action potentials in young children by use of neural response telemetry with the nucleus C124M cochlear implant.
    Mason SM; Cope Y; Garnham J; O'Donoghue GM; Gibbin KP
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Aug; 35(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 11694097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing auditory nerve recovery function with a modified subtraction method: results and mathematical modeling.
    Charasse B; Thai-Van H; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Jul; 114(7):1307-15. PubMed ID: 12842730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring the refractoriness of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.
    Morsnowski A; Charasse B; Collet L; Killian M; Müller-Deile J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(6):389-402. PubMed ID: 17008774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of auditory nerve functional states on the correlations between human and computer decisions for electrically evoked compound action potential threshold.
    Li Q; Zhang C; Lu T; Xu C; Sun Z; Fan W; Wang Z; Li S
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109866. PubMed ID: 31945736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Abbas PJ; Brown CJ; Shallop JK; Firszt JB; Hughes ML; Hong SH; Staller SJ
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 10037065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Gantz BJ
    Am J Otol; 1998 May; 19(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 9596182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2205-10. PubMed ID: 2269736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Borland J; Bertschy MR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Jun; 39(3):453-67. PubMed ID: 8783126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The neuronal response to electrical constant-amplitude pulse train stimulation: evoked compound action potential recordings.
    Matsuoka AJ; Abbas PJ; Rubinstein JT; Miller CA
    Hear Res; 2000 Nov; 149(1-2):115-28. PubMed ID: 11033251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults.
    Brown CJ; Hughes ML; Luk B; Abbas PJ; Wolaver A; Gervais J
    Ear Hear; 2000 Apr; 21(2):151-63. PubMed ID: 10777022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model of a nucleus 24 cochlear implant fitting protocol based on the electrically evoked whole nerve action potential.
    Franck KH
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):67S-71S. PubMed ID: 11883769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
    Bahmer A; Peter O; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of Alternating Polarity and Forward Masking Artifact-Reduction Methods to Resolve the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
    Baudhuin JL; Hughes ML; Goehring JL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e247-55. PubMed ID: 26928001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustically derived auditory nerve action potential evoked by electrical stimulation: an estimation of the waveform of single unit contribution.
    de Sauvage RC; Cazals Y; Erre JP; Aran JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):616-27. PubMed ID: 6841801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation.
    Heffer LF; Fallon JB
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 May; 170(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 18339428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An improved masker-probe method for stimulus artifact reduction in electrically evoked compound action potentials.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldan C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Oct; 175(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18771694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Rubinstein JT; Robinson BK; Matsuoka AJ; Woodworth G
    Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):142-54. PubMed ID: 9641327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Refractory behaviour of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve].
    Morsnowski A; Charasse B; Collet L; Killian M; Müller-Deile J
    HNO; 2008 Feb; 56(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18273660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrode independence in intraneural cochlear nerve stimulation.
    Badi AN; Owa AO; Shelton C; Normann RA
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 17195741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.