These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

913 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10981779)

  • 1. Fred Hollows lecture: digital screening for eye disease.
    Constable IJ; Yogesan K; Eikelboom R; Barry C; Cuypers M
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2000 Jun; 28(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 10981779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma.
    Yogesan K; Constable IJ; Barry CJ; Eikelboom RH; Morgan W; Tay-Kearney ML; Jitskaia L
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 10529928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Telemedicine screening of diabetic retinopathy using a hand-held fundus camera.
    Yogesan K; Constable IJ; Barry CJ; Eikelboom RH; McAllister IL; Tay-Kearney ML
    Telemed J; 2000; 6(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 10957734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
    Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is digital image compression acceptable within diabetic retinopathy screening?
    Basu A; Kamal AD; Illahi W; Khan M; Stavrou P; Ryder RE
    Diabet Med; 2003 Sep; 20(9):766-71. PubMed ID: 12925059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement between stereoscopic photographs, clinical assessment, Heidelberg retina tomograph and digital stereoscopic optic disc camera in estimating vertical cup:disc ratio.
    Jayasundera T; Danesh-Meyer HV; Donaldson M; Gamble G
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 33(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 15932529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
    Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic Accuracy of Detecting Diabetic Retinopathy by Using Digital Fundus Photographs in the Peripheral Health Facilities of Bangladesh: Validation Study.
    Begum T; Rahman A; Nomani D; Mamun A; Adams A; Islam S; Khair Z; Khair Z; Anwar I
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2021 Mar; 7(3):e23538. PubMed ID: 33411671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy.
    Bursell SE; Cavallerano JD; Cavallerano AA; Clermont AC; Birkmire-Peters D; Aiello LP; Aiello LM;
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Mar; 108(3):572-85. PubMed ID: 11237913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why Miss the Chance? Incidental Findings while Telescreening for Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Mastropasqua L; Perilli R; D'Aloisio R; Toto L; Mastropasqua A; Donato S; Taraborrelli M; Ginestra F; Porta M; Consoli A
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 27(4):237-245. PubMed ID: 31958252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural area using single-field, digital fundus images.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Wongcumchang N; Surawongsin P; Panyawatananukul E; Tiensuwan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 15962667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glaucoma Screening in Nepal: Cup-to-Disc Estimate With Standard Mydriatic Fundus Camera Compared to Portable Nonmydriatic Camera.
    Miller SE; Thapa S; Robin AL; Niziol LM; Ramulu PY; Woodward MA; Paudyal I; Pitha I; Kim TN; Newman-Casey PA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 182():99-106. PubMed ID: 28734816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
    Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of real-time telemedicine in the detection of diabetic macular oedema: a pilot study.
    Peter J; Piantadosi J; Piantadosi C; Cooper P; Gehling N; Kaufmann C; Goggin M
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006; 34(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 16764649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variance owing to observer, repeat imaging, and fundus camera type on cup-to-disc ratio estimates by stereo planimetry.
    Kwon YH; Adix M; Zimmerman MB; Piette S; Greenlee EC; Alward WL; Abràmoff MD
    J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 19365196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging vs standard ophthalmologic evaluation for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
    Li Z; Wu C; Olayiwola JN; Hilaire DS; Huang JJ
    Conn Med; 2012 Feb; 76(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 22670358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
    Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
    Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing diabetic retinopathy using two-field digital photography and the influence of JPEG-compression.
    Stellingwerf C; Hardus PL; Hooymans JM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 108(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 15573944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of low-light nonmydriatic digital imaging with 35-mm ETDRS seven-standard field stereo color fundus photographs and clinical examination.
    Silva PS; Walia S; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Dunn C; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
    Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):492-9. PubMed ID: 22827402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.