These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10981839)

  • 1. Toward understanding why fairness matters: the influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness.
    van den Bos K; Miedema J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Sep; 79(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10981839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness.
    van den Bos K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jun; 80(6):931-41. PubMed ID: 11414375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.
    van Prooijen JW; van den Bos K; Wilke HA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1353-61. PubMed ID: 12500817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.
    van den Bos K; Lind EA; Vermunt R; Wilke HA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1997 May; 72(5):1034-46. PubMed ID: 9150583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Death and television: terror management theory and themes of law and justice on television.
    Taylor LD
    Death Stud; 2012 Apr; 36(4):340-59. PubMed ID: 24567990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderating effect of uncertainty.
    De Cremer D; Brockner J; Fishman A; van Dijke M; van Olffen W; Mayer DM
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Mar; 95(2):291-304. PubMed ID: 20230070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.
    De Cremer D; Tyler TR
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 17484547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fairness heuristic theory is an empirical framework: a reply to Arnadóttir.
    Van den Bos K; Lind EA
    Scand J Psychol; 2004 Jul; 45(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 15182246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Greed, death, and values: from terror management to transcendence management theory.
    Cozzolino PJ; Staples AD; Meyers LS; Samboceti J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Mar; 30(3):278-92. PubMed ID: 15030620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and judgments of an authority's responsibility.
    Brockner J; Fishman AY; Reb J; Goldman B; Spiegel S; Garden C
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1657-71. PubMed ID: 18020803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of national culture on the perceived fairness of grading procedures: a comparison of the United States and China.
    Tata J
    J Psychol; 2005 Sep; 139(5):401-12. PubMed ID: 16285211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reactions to decisions with uncertain consequences: reliance on perceived fairness versus predicted outcomes depends on knowledge.
    See KE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):104-18. PubMed ID: 19210067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What's fair is fair--or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice.
    Rasinski KA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1987 Jul; 53(1):201-11. PubMed ID: 3612490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive bias in procedural justice: formation and implications of illusory correlations in perceived intergroup fairness.
    Stroessner SJ; Heuer LB
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Oct; 71(4):717-28. PubMed ID: 8888600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trust, confidence, procedural fairness, outcome fairness, moral conviction, and the acceptance of GM field experiments.
    Siegrist M; Connor M; Keller C
    Risk Anal; 2012 Aug; 32(8):1394-403. PubMed ID: 22150405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome fairness and procedural fairness.
    Bianchi EC; Brockner J; van den Bos K; Seifert M; Moon H; van Dijke M; De Cremer D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 25387762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects.
    van Dijke M; De Cremer D; Mayer DM
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 May; 95(3):488-502. PubMed ID: 20476828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fairness heuristic theory: valid but not empirical.
    Arnadóttir SP
    Scand J Psychol; 2002 Sep; 43(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 12361103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of control motivation in mortality salience effects on ingroup support and defense.
    Fritsche I; Jonas E; Fankhänel T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Sep; 95(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 18729692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medium of exchange matters: what's fair for goods is unfair for money.
    DeVoe SE; Iyengar SS
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 20424037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.