These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10981978)

  • 1. An in vitro study of the accuracy of a new protocol for planning distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.
    Gateno J; Allen ME; Teichgraeber JF; Messersmith ML
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Sep; 58(9):985-90; discussion 990-1. PubMed ID: 10981978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer planning for distraction osteogenesis.
    Gateño J; Teichgraeber JF; Aguilar E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Mar; 105(3):873-82. PubMed ID: 10724245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of skeletal movements in mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Yeshwant K; Seldin EB; Gateno J; Everett P; White CL; Kikinis R; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 15742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of stereolithographic drilling and cutting guides in bilateral mandibular distraction.
    Seeberger R; Davids R; Kater W; Thiele OC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2031-5. PubMed ID: 22067855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stereolithographic models for simulation and transfer of vector in vertical distraction of the mandibular ramus: a technical note.
    Kofod T; Pedersen TK; Nørholt SE; Jensen J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 16(4):608-14. PubMed ID: 16077305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of rapid prototyping in the preoperative planning of distraction osteogenesis of the cranio-maxillofacial skeleton.
    Poukens J; Haex J; Riediger D
    Comput Aided Surg; 2003; 8(3):146-54. PubMed ID: 15253367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment planning and biomechanics of distraction osteogenesis from an orthodontic perspective.
    Grayson BH; Santiago PE
    Semin Orthod; 1999 Mar; 5(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 10371936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distraction osteogenesis: a method to improve facial balance in asymmetric patients.
    Robiony M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):508-12. PubMed ID: 20216446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theoretical considerations for the surgical correction of mandibular deformity in hemifacial microsomia patients using multifocal distraction osteogenesis.
    Kunz C; Brauchli L; Moehle T; Rahn B; Hammer B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):364-8. PubMed ID: 12618978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A CT scan technique for quantitative volumetric assessment of the mandible after distraction osteogenesis.
    Roth DA; Gosain AK; McCarthy JG; Stracher MA; Lefton DR; Grayson BH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Apr; 99(5):1237-47; discussion 1248-50. PubMed ID: 9105350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a three-dimensional treatment planning system based on computed tomographic data.
    Troulis MJ; Everett P; Seldin EB; Kikinis R; Kaban LB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Aug; 31(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 12361065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Error analysis of a CAD/CAM method for unidirectional mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia.
    Sun H; Li B; Zhao Z; Zhang L; Shen SG; Wang X
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):892-7. PubMed ID: 23583007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of distraction osteogenesis of the mandible on upper airway volume and resistance in children with micrognathia.
    Perlyn CA; Schmelzer RE; Sutera SP; Kane AA; Govier D; Marsh JL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 May; 109(6):1809-18. PubMed ID: 11994577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional surgical planning for maxillary and midface distraction osteogenesis.
    Gateno J; Teichgraeber JF; Xia JJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Nov; 14(6):833-9. PubMed ID: 14600624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Condyle as the point of rotation for 3-D planning of distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia.
    Paeng JY; Lee JH; Lee JH; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 35(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 17448668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandibular deformities: single-vector distraction techniques for a multivector problem.
    Singh DJ; Glick PH; Bartlett SP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1468-72. PubMed ID: 19816280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulation-guided navigation for vector control in pediatric mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Badiali G; Cutolo F; Roncari A; Marchetti C; Bianchi A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):969-980. PubMed ID: 28347627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of distraction vector transfer in unilateral vertical distraction of the mandibular ramus.
    Kofod T; Nørholt SE; Pedersen TK; Jensen J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 16(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15699640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical experience with the application of distraction osteogenesis for airway obstruction.
    Genecov DG; Barceló CR; Steinberg D; Trone T; Sperry E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1817-21. PubMed ID: 19816357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-assisted surgery in therapeutic strategy distraction osteogenesis of hemifacial microsomia: Accuracy and predictability.
    Tan A; Chai Y; Mooi W; Chen X; Xu H; Zin MA; Lin L; Zhang Y; Yang X; Chai G
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Feb; 47(2):204-218. PubMed ID: 30583926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.