186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10981996)
1. Estimation of fetal radiation dose from computed tomography scanning in late pregnancy: depth-dose data from routine examinations.
Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Voloudaki A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Invest Radiol; 2000 Sep; 35(9):527-33. PubMed ID: 10981996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early first-trimester fetal radiation dose estimation in 16-MDCT without and with automated tube current modulation.
Jaffe TA; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva GI; Nguyen G; Hurwitz LM; Nelson RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):860-4. PubMed ID: 18356429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating fetal dose from tube current-modulated (TCM) and fixed tube current (FTC) abdominal/pelvis CT examinations.
Hardy AJ; Angel E; Bostani M; Cagnon C; McNitt-Gray M
Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2729-2743. PubMed ID: 30893477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal radiation dose during gestation estimated on an anthropomorphic phantom for three generations of CT scanners.
Gilet AG; Dunkin JM; Fernandez TJ; Button TM; Budorick NE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):1133-7. PubMed ID: 21512081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Embryo/fetus radiation dose and risk from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations.
Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Vrahoriti H; Kontakis G; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Sep; 13(9):716-22. PubMed ID: 12195535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the use of Monte Carlo-derived dosimetric data in the estimation of patient dose from CT examinations.
Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2018-28. PubMed ID: 18561678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control.
Israel GM; Cicchiello L; Brink J; Huda W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1342-6. PubMed ID: 21098193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of fetal radiation exposure in pregnant women undergoing computed tomography and rotational angiography examinations for pelvic trauma.
Matsunaga Y; Haba T; Kobayashi M; Suzuki S; Asada Y; Chida K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Apr; 200(6):580-587. PubMed ID: 38486458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal shielding combined with state of the art CT dose reduction strategies during maternal chest CT.
Chatterson LC; Leswick DA; Fladeland DA; Hunt MM; Webster S; Lim H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1199-1204. PubMed ID: 24838282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation dose reduction in thoracic and abdomen-pelvic CT using tube current modulation: a phantom study.
Sabarudin A; Mustafa Z; Nassir KM; Hamid HA; Sun Z
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5135. PubMed ID: 25679153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation dose to the fetus for pregnant patients undergoing multidetector CT imaging: Monte Carlo simulations estimating fetal dose for a range of gestational age and patient size.
Angel E; Wellnitz CV; Goodsitt MM; Yaghmai N; DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Sayre JW; Cody DD; Stevens DM; Primak AN; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Radiology; 2008 Oct; 249(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 18796678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strategies for formulating appropriate MDCT techniques when imaging the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in pediatric patients.
Cody DD; Moxley DM; Krugh KT; O'Daniel JC; Wagner LK; Eftekhari F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):849-59. PubMed ID: 15039151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Papadimitriou D
Br J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 74(885):836-40. PubMed ID: 11560832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal radiation dose in three common CT examinations during pregnancy - Monte Carlo study.
Kelaranta A; Mäkelä T; Kaasalainen T; Kortesniemi M
Phys Med; 2017 Nov; 43():199-206. PubMed ID: 28941740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Normalized conceptus doses for abdominal radiographic examinations calculated using a Monte Carlo technique.
Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Sideri L; Perisinakis K; Stamatelatos IE; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2641-8. PubMed ID: 12462731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ABDOMEN-PELVIS COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY PROTOCOL OPTIMIZATION: AN IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE ASSESSMENT.
Pelegrino Bastos Maués NH; Fattori Alves AF; Menegatti Pavan AL; Marrone Ribeiro S; Yamashita S; Petean Trindade A; Mascarenhas YM; Nicolucci P; Rodrigues de Pina D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 30371858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. X-ray pelvimetry--which is the best technique?
Badr I; Thomas SM; Cotterill AD; Pettett A; Oduko JM; Fitzgerald M; Adam EJ
Clin Radiol; 1997 Feb; 52(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9043048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose evaluation and effective dose estimation from multi detector CT.
Nishizawa K; Matsumoto M; Iwai K; Tonari A; Yoshida T; Takayama M
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 12766279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PATIENTS DOSE ESTIMATION IN CT EXAMINATIONS USING SIZE SPECIFIC DOSE ESTIMATES.
Choudhary N; Rana BS; Shukla A; Oinam AS; Singh NP; Kumar S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):256-262. PubMed ID: 30496523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Female breast, lung, and pelvic organ radiation from dose-reduced 64-MDCT thoracic examination protocols: a phantom study.
Litmanovich D; Tack D; Lin PJ; Boiselle PM; Raptopoulos V; Bankier AA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):929-34. PubMed ID: 21940581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
