These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10982932)

  • 21. Effect of loading mode on bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with 2 systems.
    Katona TR; Long RW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 16443480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of fluoride-releasing light-cured resin on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Tuncer C; Tuncer BB; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):14.e1-6; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19121495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Office reconditioning of stainless steel orthodontic attachments.
    Quick AN; Harris AM; Joseph VP
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 15947221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved orthodontic bonding to silver amalgam. Part 2. Lathe-cut, admixed, and spherical amalgams with different intermediate resins.
    Büyükyilmaz T; Zachrisson BU
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Aug; 68(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 9709834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile loading.
    Soderquist SA; Drummond JL; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):175.e7-175.e12. PubMed ID: 16473707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effectiveness of a hydrophilic primer when different antimicrobial agents are mixed.
    Karaman AI; Uysal T
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):414-9. PubMed ID: 15264657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Reddy L; Marker VA; Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 12618999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of water and saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of a new light-cured cyanoacrylate adhesive.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Gatti S; Klersy C
    Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 17364037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel.
    Adanir N; Türkkahraman H; Yalçin Güngör A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 19073952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
    Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; VonWald L; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):621-4. PubMed ID: 11395706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Shear bond strength of a new dental adhesive used to bond brackets to unetched enamel.
    Harari D; Gillis I; Redlich M
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):519-23. PubMed ID: 12407947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of cross-head speed in orthodontic bond strength testing.
    Klocke A; Kahl-Nieke B
    Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 15681012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bond strengths and adhesive remnant index of self-etching adhesives used to bond brackets to instrumented and uninstrumented enamel.
    Ritter DE; Ritter AV; Bruggeman G; Locks A; Tulloch JF
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 16555658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of a flowable ormocer for bonding brackets.
    Vicente A; Bravo LA
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):292-4. PubMed ID: 17993024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
    Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of a new nano-filled restorative material for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Soliman MM; Oonsombat C; Laffoon JF; Warren J
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 17373220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adhesion promoters: effects on the bond strength of brackets.
    Vicente A; Bravo LA; Romero M; Ortiz AJ; Canteras M
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):323-6. PubMed ID: 16433400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the debonding strength of orthodontic brackets using three different bonding systems.
    Valletta R; Prisco D; De Santis R; Ambrosio L; Martina R
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 17962317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.