These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10983274)

  • 1. [Ionizing radiation].
    Masse R
    C R Acad Sci III; 2000 Jul; 323(7):633-40. PubMed ID: 10983274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship.
    Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 16468064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Basis of radiation protection].
    Roth J; Schweizer P; Gückel C
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jun; 126(26):1157-71. PubMed ID: 8711464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.
    Brenner DJ; Sachs RK
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 16470411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation epidemiology: a perspective on Fukushima.
    Boice JD
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):N33-40. PubMed ID: 22395193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ionizing radiations epidemiology does not support the LNT model.
    Ricci PF; Tharmalingam S
    Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():128-140. PubMed ID: 30763555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 197():111025. PubMed ID: 33744270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
    Scott BR
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation in the workplace-a review of studies of the risks of occupational exposure to ionising radiation.
    Wakeford R
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A61-79. PubMed ID: 19454806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cancer and ionizing radiation.
    Ulbak K
    Pharmacol Toxicol; 1993; 72 Suppl 1():64-6. PubMed ID: 8474992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ionizing radiation: future etiologic research and preventive strategies.
    Darby SC; Inskip PD
    Environ Health Perspect; 1995 Nov; 103 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):245-9. PubMed ID: 8741792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
    Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
    Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The average collective equivalent dose and fatal cancer risk for radiation workers in Radiology Department at Phramongkutklao Hospital, 2004-2008.
    Saengruang-Orn S; Mongkolsuk M; Rangsiphat T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 May; 95 Suppl 5():S96-102. PubMed ID: 22934453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ionizing radiation and cancer risk: evidence from epidemiology.
    Ron E
    Radiat Res; 1998 Nov; 150(5 Suppl):S30-41. PubMed ID: 9806607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model.
    Breckow J
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16468065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An assessment of annual whole-body occupational radiation exposure in Ireland (1996-2005).
    Colgan PA; Currivan L; Fenton D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 17562657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk estimates for radiation-induced cancer--the epidemiological evidence.
    Kellerer AM
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2000 Mar; 39(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 10789891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The 1986 and 1988 UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) reports: findings and implications.
    Mettler FA; Sinclair WK; Anspaugh L; Edington C; Harley JH; Ricks RC; Selby PB; Webster EW; Wyckoff HO
    Health Phys; 1990 Mar; 58(3):241-50. PubMed ID: 2312289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Progress in low dose health risk research: Novel effects and new concepts in low dose radiobiology.
    Averbeck D; Salomaa S; Bouffler S; Ottolenghi A; Smyth V; Sabatier L
    Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res; 2018; 776():46-69. PubMed ID: 29807577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the Linear No-Threshold Dose-Response Paradigm Still Necessary for the Assessment of Health Effects of Low Dose Radiation?
    Seong KM; Seo S; Lee D; Kim MJ; Lee SS; Park S; Jin YW
    J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Feb; 31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S10-23. PubMed ID: 26908982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.