These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10983722)

  • 1. Now I know my ABC.
    Wilson PO
    Cytopathology; 2000 Aug; 11(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 10983722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of circulation and discussion of cervical smears on agreement between laboratories.
    Ronco G; Montanari G; Confortini M; Parisio F; Berardengo E; Delpiano AM; Arnaud S; Campione D; Baldini D; Poll P; Lynge E; Mancini E; Segnan N
    Cytopathology; 2003 Jun; 14(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 12828719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening the screeners.
    Ogden J
    Nurs Stand; 1998 Feb 11-17; 12(21):12. PubMed ID: 9538758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Re: the editorial in number 4, volume 28, 2008. "Cervical cancer control in Colombia: achievements and challenges of cytology based programs"].
    Calvache AE
    Biomedica; 2009 Mar; 29(1):161-2; author reply 162-3. PubMed ID: 19753849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. European guidelines on cervical screening.
    Smith JH; Desai MS
    Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17635160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incredibly low false-negative proportion: watch out!
    Naryshkin S; Davey DD
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 10649513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical cytology internal quality assurance--what are the national standards?
    Slater D
    Cytopathology; 1994 Aug; 5(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 7948756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical cancer audit: and what is quality?
    Wilson PO
    Cytopathology; 2002 Jun; 13(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 12060075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.
    Herbert A; Johnson J; Patnick J
    Cytopathology; 1995 Oct; 6(5):301-3. PubMed ID: 8785367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical screening: what is the point?
    Robertson J; Woodend B
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward objective quality assurance: the eyes don't have it.
    Stoler MH
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Apr; 117(4):520-2. PubMed ID: 11939724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Something old and nothing new.
    Somrak TM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Dec; 17(6):401-2. PubMed ID: 9407195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quality of vaginal smear for cervical cancer screening: a concordance study].
    Cendales R; Wiesner C; Murillo RH; Piñeros M; Tovar S; Mejía JC
    Biomedica; 2010; 30(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 20890555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA '88).
    Austin RM
    Med Care; 1994 Oct; 32(10):1064-5. PubMed ID: 7934273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Internal quality control for cervical cytopathology laboratories.
    Coleman DV
    Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 8833867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality control in cervical cytology.
    Husain OA; Butler EB; Evans DM; Macgregor JE; Yule R
    J Clin Pathol; 1974 Dec; 27(12):935-44. PubMed ID: 4141708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re: using a quality control approach to define an 'adequately cellular' liquid-based cervical cytology specimen.
    Evered A
    Cytopathology; 2007 Oct; 18(5):325-6; author reply 326. PubMed ID: 17883693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rescreening for quality control in cytology.
    Melamed MR
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 8604563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of primary screening by rapid review: 'to act or not to act on the results, that is the question'.
    Slater DN
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 9577733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The challenge of quality improvement with the Papanicolaou smear.
    Kline TS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):253-5. PubMed ID: 9111111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.