81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10983727)
1. An alternative approach to the management dilemma of the mildly dyskaryotic smear based on audit of outcome.
Ifaturoti O; Lockwood S; Etheridge M; Ong PS; Rashid F; Jones MH
Cytopathology; 2000 Aug; 11(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 10983727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decision analysis for best management of mildly dyskaryotic smear.
Johnson N; Sutton J; Thornton JG; Lilford RJ; Johnson VA; Peel KR
Lancet; 1993 Jul; 342(8863):91-6. PubMed ID: 8100917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome analysis of 4 years' follow-up of patients referred for colposcopy with one smear showing mild dyskaryosis.
Ahmed AS; Goumalatsos G; Akbar N; Lawton FG; Savvas M
Cytopathology; 2008 Apr; 19(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 17937774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regular audit of colposcopic biopsies from women with a mildly dyskaryotic or borderline cervical smear results in fewer cases of CINIII.
Jones MH; Jenkins D; Singer A
Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8833870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immediate colposcopy or cytological surveillance for women with mild dyskaryosis: a cost effectiveness analysis.
Flannelly G; Campbell MK; Meldrum P; Torgerson DJ; Templeton A; Kitchener HC
J Public Health Med; 1997 Dec; 19(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 9467148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy?
Soutter WP; Wisdom S; Brough AK; Monaghan JM
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Jan; 93(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 3942709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The management dilemma of the mildly abnormal smear: fact or fiction?
Jones MH
Ann Acad Med Singap; 1998 Sep; 27(5):666-70. PubMed ID: 9919337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevalence of high-grade CIN following mild dyskaryotic smears in different age groups.
Giannopoulos T; Butler-Manuel S; Tailor A; Demetriou E; Daborn L
Cytopathology; 2005 Dec; 16(6):277-80. PubMed ID: 16303040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of human papillomavirus testing in the colposcopy clinic.
Bhaumik J; Mahadevan S; Davies AE
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Oct; 24(7):817-9. PubMed ID: 15763798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Five-year follow-up of women with borderline and mildly dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Rana DN; Marshall J; Desai M; Kitchener HC; Perera DM; El Teraifi H; Persad RV
Cytopathology; 2004 Oct; 15(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 15456414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The mildly abnormal cervical smear: patient anxiety and choice of management.
Jones MH; Singer A; Jenkins D
J R Soc Med; 1996 May; 89(5):257-60. PubMed ID: 8778432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is this the end of the line for the moderate dyskaryotic smear?
Harry VN; Narayansingh GV; Parkin DE
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Jan; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 18162808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Invasive cancer of the cervix in women with mild dyskaryosis followed up cytologically.
Soutter WP; Fletcher A
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1421-3. PubMed ID: 8019256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the accuracy of cytology in women referred for colposcopy and biopsy: the results of a 1 year audit.
Contreras-Melendez L; Herbert A; Millward-Sadler GH; Moore IE; Masson GM; Camillieri AP; Shepherd N
Cytopathology; 1992; 3(5):267-74. PubMed ID: 1288651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mild cervical dyskaryosis: safety of cytological surveillance.
Jones MH; Jenkins D; Cuzick J; Wolfendale MR; Jones JJ; Balogun-Lynch C; Usherwood MM; Singer A
Lancet; 1992 Jun; 339(8807):1440-3. PubMed ID: 1351129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The management of the mildly dyskaryotic smear.
Jones MH
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Jun; 101(6):474-6. PubMed ID: 8018634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Costs and benefits of cervical screening. I. The costs of the cervical screening programme.
Waugh N; Smith I; Robertson A; Reid GS; Halkerston R; Grant A
Cytopathology; 1996 Aug; 7(4):231-40. PubMed ID: 8853969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
