These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10983883)

  • 1. Development of an opto-electronic positioning device for serial direct digital images of oral structures.
    Morea C; Langlotz F; Scheer C; Bürgin W; Nolte LP; Lang NP; Brägger U
    J Periodontal Res; 2000 Aug; 35(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 10983883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Initial application of a geometric QA tool for integrated MV and kV imaging systems on three image guided radiotherapy systems.
    Mao W; Speiser M; Medin P; Papiez L; Solberg T; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2335-41. PubMed ID: 21776767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A precise receptor-positioning device for subtraction radiography, based on cross-arch stabilization.
    Couture RA; Dixon DA; Hildebolt CF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jul; 34(4):231-6. PubMed ID: 15961598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices.
    Mauriello SM; Tang Q; Johnson KB; Hadgraft HH; Platin E
    J Dent Hyg; 2015 Dec; 89(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 26684996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of a new software in eliminating the angulation errors in digital subtraction radiography.
    Güneri P; Göğüş S; Tuğsel Z; Boyacioğlu H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):484-9. PubMed ID: 18033945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
    J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An aiming device for an extraoral radiographic technique.
    Chen CH; Lin SH; Chiu HL; Lin YJ; Chen YK; Lin LM
    J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):758-60. PubMed ID: 17509422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of three methods of geometric image reconstruction for digital subtraction radiography.
    Queiroz PM; Oliveira ML; Tanaka JL; Soares MG; Haiter-Neto F; Ono E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160120. PubMed ID: 27376702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accurate technique for complete geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography systems.
    Cho Y; Moseley DJ; Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):968-83. PubMed ID: 15895580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Film-holding instruments for intraoral subtraction radiography.
    Rudolph DJ; White SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jun; 65(6):767-72. PubMed ID: 3041341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suitability of the general-purpose graphic printer as an image output device for digital dental x-ray images.
    Nishikawa K; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 10710467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Computer-assisted surgical navigation with a dynamic mobile framework for the nasal fossae, sinuses and base of the skull].
    Caversaccio M; Lädrach K; Bächler R; Schroth G; Nolte LP; Häusler R
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1998 Nov; 115(5):253-8. PubMed ID: 9881171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ROI-based image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Huh KH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):523-9. PubMed ID: 16545718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auto calibration of a cone-beam-CT.
    Gross D; Heil U; Schulze R; Schoemer E; Schwanecke U
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5959-70. PubMed ID: 23039634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system.
    Ellwood RP; Davies RM; Worthington HV
    J Periodontal Res; 1997 Feb; 32(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 9089491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative analysis of errors in alveolar crest level caused by discrepant projection geometry in digital subtraction radiography: an in vivo study.
    Huh KH; Lee SS; Jeon IS; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Dec; 100(6):750-5. PubMed ID: 16301158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the results of periodontal treatment by means of digital subtraction of radiographic images.
    Kulczyk T
    Adv Med Sci; 2006; 51 Suppl 1():126-9. PubMed ID: 17458075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Method for measuring the focal spot size of an x-ray tube using a coded aperture mask and a digital detector.
    Russo P; Mettivier G
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2099-115. PubMed ID: 21626943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging.
    Baba R; Ueda K; Okabe M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15585803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Digital radiology using the DIGORA registration technic].
    van der Stelt PF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 9289753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.