These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10984240)

  • 41. The current status of positron emission mammography in breast cancer diagnosis.
    Kalles V; Zografos GC; Provatopoulou X; Koulocheri D; Gounaris A
    Breast Cancer; 2013 Apr; 20(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 23239242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Three-Dimensional Positron Emission Mammography versus Whole Body Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer.
    Dai D; Song X; Wang M; Li L; Ma W; Xu W; Ma Y; Liu J; Zhang J; Liu P; Gu X; Su Y
    Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2017; 2017():5438395. PubMed ID: 29097927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography.
    Black QC; Grills IS; Kestin LL; Wong CY; Wong JW; Martinez AA; Yan D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1272-82. PubMed ID: 15519800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Performance evaluation of a high resolution dedicated breast PET scanner.
    García Hernández T; Vicedo González A; Ferrer Rebolleda J; Sánchez Jurado R; Roselló Ferrando J; Brualla González L; Granero Cabañero D; Del Puig Cozar Santiago M
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2261. PubMed ID: 27147338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Positron emission mammography: correlation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and 18F-FDG.
    Wang CL; MacDonald LR; Rogers JV; Aravkin A; Haseley DR; Beatty JD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):W247-55. PubMed ID: 21785049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera.
    Surti S; Karp JS
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Jun; 45(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15181139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Detection-ability evaluation of the PEImager for positron emission mammography applications.
    Jan ML; Ni YC; Chuang KS; Liang HC; Fu YK
    Phys Med; 2006; 21 Suppl 1():109-13. PubMed ID: 17646009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Impact of target-to-background ratio, target size, emission scan duration, and activity on physical figures of merit for a 3D LSO-based whole body PET/CT scanner.
    Brambilla M; Matheoud R; Secco C; Sacchetti G; Comi S; Rudoni M; Carriero A; Inglese E
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3854-65. PubMed ID: 17985631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Breast cancer staging in a single session: whole-body PET/CT mammography.
    Heusner TA; Kuemmel S; Umutlu L; Koeninger A; Freudenberg LS; Hauth EA; Kimmig KR; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 49(8):1215-22. PubMed ID: 18632831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparative analysis of imaging sensitivity of positron emission mammography and whole-body PET in relation to tumor size.
    Yamamoto Y; Ozawa Y; Kubouchi K; Nakamura S; Nakajima Y; Inoue T
    Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 40(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 25423346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Technique to obtain positron emission mammography images in registration with x-ray mammograms.
    Bergman AM; Thompson CJ; Murthy K; Robar JL; Clancy RL; English MJ
    Med Phys; 1998 Nov; 25(11):2119-29. PubMed ID: 9829236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mammotomography with pinhole incomplete circular orbit SPECT.
    Tornai MP; Bowsher JE; Jaszczak RJ; Pieper BC; Greer KL; Hardenbergh PH; Coleman RE
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Apr; 44(4):583-93. PubMed ID: 12679403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Radiologist views of positron emission mammography.
    Greene LR; George RF
    Radiol Technol; 2012; 84(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 22988260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Usefulness of breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct modality in breast cancer patients with dense breast: a comparative study with MRI.
    Kim BS
    Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Feb; 26(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 22006539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
    Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
    Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.
    Surti S; Kuhn A; Werner ME; Perkins AE; Kolthammer J; Karp JS
    J Nucl Med; 2007 Mar; 48(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 17332626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
    Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A dedicated phantom design for positron emission mammography performance evaluation.
    Torres-Urzúa LF; Alva-Sánchez H; Martínez-Dávalos A; García-Pérez FO; Peruyero-Rivas RM; Rodríguez-Villafuerte M
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245003. PubMed ID: 32693400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Feasibility study for positron emission mammography.
    Thompson CJ; Murthy K; Weinberg IN; Mako F
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 8058019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.