99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10984245)
1. Comment on clinical implementation of the AAPM's Task Group-51 protocol for calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Rodgers JE; Niroomand-Rad A; Lundsten M
Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1995-6. PubMed ID: 10984245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comment on "AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams" [Med. Phys. 26, 1847-1870 (1999)].
Khan FM
Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):445-7. PubMed ID: 10757595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams.
Med Phys; 1983; 10(6):741-71. PubMed ID: 6419029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The implementation of the AAPM Task Group 21 protocol by the Radiological Physics Center and its implications.
Gastorf RJ; Hanson WF; Shalek RJ; Berkley LW
Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 6434921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implications of adopting the AAPM TG-21 calibration protocol for very high energy photon and electron beams.
Zwicker RD; Wu A; Sternick ES
Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 6434922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Electron beams.
Jones JC
Br J Radiol; 1972; 11():Suppl 11:83-7. PubMed ID: 4622872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simplified TRS398 dosimetry protocol for dose determination in high-energy electrons beams.
Behin-Ain S; Lanzon P
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):2205-9. PubMed ID: 16625036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.
Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):293-8. PubMed ID: 8497213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The protocols and codes of practice used for the determination of absorbed dose in megavoltage photon and electron beams.
Weatherburn H; Nisbet A
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1991; 19(2-3):147-80. PubMed ID: 1769240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.
Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME
Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.
Huq MS; Nath R
Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 1901129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams.
McEwen M; DeWerd L; Ibbott G; Followill D; Rogers DW; Seltzer S; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041501. PubMed ID: 24694120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of dose calibration by ionometric and chemical dosimetry for 6- and 45-MV x-ray beams.
Zwicker RD; Wu A; Sternick ES
Med Phys; 1991; 18(6):1251-3. PubMed ID: 1753913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AAPM Task Group 21 protocol: dosimetric evaluation.
Paul JM; Koch RF; Philip PC
Med Phys; 1985; 12(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 3929049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Very high energy electromagnetically-scanned electron beams are an attractive alternative to photon IMRT. For the proposition.
Papiez L
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):1945-6. PubMed ID: 15305443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of two water-equivalent phantom materials for output calibration of photon and electron beams.
Liu L; Prasad SC; Bassano DA
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 14684192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
