These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Effects of cyclic temperature changes on water sorption and solubility of composite restoratives. Yap AU; Wee KE Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 11933905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Occlusal contact area (OCA) wear of two new composite restoratives. Yap AU J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Feb; 29(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 11856400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the wear resistance of packable composite equal that of dental amalgam? Suzuki S J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(6):355-65; discussion 365-7. PubMed ID: 15801341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator. Part II. An SEM evaluation. Yap AU; Ong LF; Teoh SH; Hastings GW J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Jan; 27(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10632843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Yap AU; Tan CH; Chung SM Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 15195726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of mouthrinses on microhardness and wear of composite and compomer restoratives. Yap AU; Tan BW; Tay LC; Chang KM; Loy TK; Mok BY Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):740-6. PubMed ID: 14653289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Release of methacrylic acid from dental composites. Yap AU; Lee HK; Sabapathy R Dent Mater; 2000 May; 16(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 10762677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of cyclic temperature changes on hardness of composite restoratives. Yap AU; Wee KE; Teoh SH Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11822363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of flexural properties of composite restoratives using the ISO and mini-flexural tests. Yap AU; Teoh SH J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Feb; 30(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 12535144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives. Suzuki S; Nagai E; Taira Y; Minesaki Y J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 12447221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials. Say EC; Civelek A; Nobecourt A; Ersoy M; Guleryuz C Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 14531611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials. Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-body in vitro wear study of some current dental composites and amalgams. Hu X; Marquis PM; Shortall AC J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 10424987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]