These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10984882)

  • 1. [Classification of medical technologies of breast studies].
    Rozhkova NI; Kochetova GP
    Med Tekh; 2000; (4):41-4. PubMed ID: 10984882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Imaging techniques of the breast in 1991. 1].
    Flageat J; Vicens JL; Buchon R
    J Radiol; 1991 Dec; 72(12):645-54. PubMed ID: 1787432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.
    Kapur A; Carson PL; Eberhard J; Goodsitt MM; Thomenius K; Lokhandwalla M; Buckley D; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Booi RC; LeCarpentier GL; Erkamp RQ; Chan HP; Fowlkes JB; Thomas J; Landberg C
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Aug; 3(4):325-34. PubMed ID: 15270583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An MRI/US/x-ray compatible breast localization marker: in vivo evaluation.
    Li Y; Holloway CM; Purcell CM; Wang J; Plewes DB
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1557-66. PubMed ID: 16321745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The specific features of diagnosis of breast diseases accompanied by the retracted nipple syndrome].
    Rozhkova NI; Berzin SA; Shevchenko SA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2006; (4):14-8. PubMed ID: 17633884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Large-core breast biopsy offers reliable diagnosis.
    Parker SH; Jobe WE
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1990 Oct; 12(10):90-7. PubMed ID: 10149374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond standard mammographic screening: mammography at age extremes, ultrasound, and MR imaging.
    Berg WA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):895-906, vii. PubMed ID: 17888776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Registered 3-D ultrasound and digital stereotactic mammography for breast biopsy guidance.
    Irwin MR; Downey DB; Gardi L; Fenster A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Mar; 27(3):391-401. PubMed ID: 18334434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: imaging findings mimicking malignancy and histopathological features.
    Ruiz-Delgado ML; López-Ruiz JA; Eizaguirre B; Saiz A; Astigarraga E; Fernández-Temprano Z
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Feb; 48(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 17325921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Interventional radiology in nonpalpable lesions of the breast].
    Tardivon A; Meunier M; El Khoury C; Thibault F
    J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 84(4 Pt 1):381-6. PubMed ID: 12759651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
    Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of imaging in diagnosis of carcinoma of breast.
    Ahmed R; Ali SM
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Apr; 15(4):238-41. PubMed ID: 15857599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Breast imaging].
    Thibault F; Hagay Ch; Boyer B
    J Radiol; 2004; 85(7-8):942-50. PubMed ID: 15331991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The technical support of mammography].
    Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Riudiger IuG; Kochetova GP; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
    Med Tekh; 2000; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasound imaging features of radial scars of the breast.
    Lee E; Wylie E; Metcalf C
    Australas Radiol; 2007 Jun; 51(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 17504315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of terminology for mammographic techniques for radiological technologists.
    Yagahara A; Yokooka Y; Tsuji S; Nishimoto N; Uesugi M; Muto H; Ohba H; Kurowarabi K; Ogasawara K
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jul; 4(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 21534017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasound characterizes equivocal breast lesions.
    D'Agincourt L
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Mar; 16(3):49-59. PubMed ID: 10146686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.