223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10985630)
1. Positive nickel patch tests do not intensify positive reactions to adjacent patch tests with dichromate. Results from a double-blind multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Brasch J; Kreilgård B; Henseler T; Aberer W; Fuchs T; Pflüger R; Hoeck U; Gefeller O
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Sep; 43(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 10985630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patch testing of nickel sulfate and potassium dichromate with a standardized ready-to-use test system gives highly reproducible results: a double-blind multicentre study.
Brasch J; Henseler T; Aberer W; Fuchs T; Hoeck U; Kreilgård B;
Acta Derm Venereol; 2001 May; 81(2):122-4. PubMed ID: 11501649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positive patch test reactions to nickel sulphate are not modified by neighbouring negative fragrance patch tests. A multicenter-study by the German contact dermatitis research group.
Brasch J; Weichenthal M; Szliska C; Löffler H; Koch P; Grabbe J; Mahler V; Kreilgård B; Hoeck U;
Acta Derm Venereol; 2006; 86(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 16874422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patch test reactivity to metal allergens following regulatory interventions: a 33-year retrospective study.
Thyssen JP; Ross-Hansen K; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Aug; 63(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20629675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of irritant patch test reactions to sodium lauryl sulfate in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study using clinical scoring. Results from a study group of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Brasch J; Becker D; Effendy I
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Sep; 41(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 10475514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cobalt allergy: suitable test concentration, and concomitant reactivity to nickel and chromium.
Lidén C; Andersson N; Julander A; Matura M
Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Jun; 74(6):360-7. PubMed ID: 26996152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patch test results in schoolchildren. Results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
Brasch J; Geier J
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Dec; 37(6):286-93. PubMed ID: 9455632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reproducibility of nickel, cobalt and chromate sensitization in patients tested at least twice in the period 1992-2014 with TRUE Test®.
Schaeffer AC; Andersen KE; Bindslev-Jensen C; Mortz CG
Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Aug; 75(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 27385519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental patch testing with chromium-coated materials.
Bregnbak D; Thyssen JP; Jellesen MS; Zachariae C; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Jun; 76(6):333-341. PubMed ID: 28120332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Allergic contact dermatitis to metal allergens in Iran.
Khatami A; Nassiri-Kashani M; Gorouhi F; Babakoohi S; Kazerouni-Timsar A; Davari P; Sarraf-Yazdy M; Dowlati Y; Firooz A
Int J Dermatol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):1513-8. PubMed ID: 23488935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence of delayed hypersensitivity to the European standard series in a self-selected population.
Greig JE; Carson CF; Stuckey MS; Riley TV
Australas J Dermatol; 2000 May; 41(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 10812700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Common contact sensitizers in Chandigarh, India. A study of 200 patients with the European standard series.
Sharma VK; Chakrabarti A
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Mar; 38(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 9536402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increased sensitivity of patch testing by standardized tape stripping beforehand: a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.
Dickel H; Kreft B; Kuss O; Worm M; Soost S; Brasch J; Pfützner W; Grabbe J; Angelova-Fischer I; Elsner P; Fluhr J; Altmeyer P; Geier J
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 May; 62(5):294-302. PubMed ID: 20536477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of patch testing in atopic dermatitis.
el Samahy MH; el-Kerdani T
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 9249284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Allergic contact dermatitis in Iran.
Kashani MN; Gorouhi F; Behnia F; Nazemi MJ; Dowlati Y; Firooz A
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Mar; 52(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 15811031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive patch test reactions to nickel, cobalt, and potassium dichromate in a series of 576 patients.
Massone L; Anonide A; Borghi S; Isola V
Cutis; 1991 Feb; 47(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 2001632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing reliabilities of strip and conventional patch testing.
Dickel H; Geier J; Kreft B; Pfützner W; Kuss O
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Jun; 76(6):342-349. PubMed ID: 28271532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. False-positive, follicular and irritant patch test reactions to metal salts.
Fischer T; Rystedt I
Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Feb; 12(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 3157537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patch-test results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006.
Zug KA; Warshaw EM; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Belsito DL; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Mathias CG; Deleo VA; Rietschel RL; Marks J
Dermatitis; 2009; 20(3):149-60. PubMed ID: 19470301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
