BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10986859)

  • 21. Medicate-to-execute: current trends in death penalty jurisprudence and the perils of dual loyalty.
    Shaivitz DS
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(1):149-74. PubMed ID: 15468506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Establishing mental retardation in capital cases: a potential matter of life and death.
    Baroff GS
    Ment Retard; 1991 Dec; 29(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 1775075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. "Synthetic sanity": the ethics and legality of using psychotropic medications to render death row inmates competent for execution.
    Daugherty KM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 17(2):715-35. PubMed ID: 11475573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
    LeBlanc SM
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Capital punishment and offenders with mental retardation: response to the Penry brief.
    Calnen T; Blackman LS
    Am J Ment Retard; 1992 May; 96(6):557-64; discussion 565-75. PubMed ID: 1344935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Coming out of the darkness: America's criminal justice system and persons with intellectual disabilities in the 20th century.
    Perske R
    Intellect Dev Disabil; 2007 Jun; 45(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 17472430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Forcible medication: a new insanity defence.
    Economist; 2003 Mar; 366(8313):31. PubMed ID: 15022679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating competency to stand trial with evidence-based practice.
    Rogers R; Johansson-Love J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):450-60. PubMed ID: 20018994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recommendation and report on the death penalty and persons with mental disabilities.
    Igasaki PM; Pasano MS; LaBarre SC; Coleman JE; Mascherin TL
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2006; 30(5):668-77. PubMed ID: 17228614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: implementing Atkins v. Virginia.
    Bonnie RJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 15515919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Combat veterans, mental health issues, and the death penalty: addressing the impact of post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury.
    Giardino AE
    Fordham Law Rev; 2009 May; 77(6):2955-95. PubMed ID: 19618551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Psychosis and punishment. Should the mentally ill be drugged so they can face execution?
    Szegedy-Maszak M
    US News World Rep; 2001 Mar; 130(12):50-1. PubMed ID: 11277042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. State can make inmate sane enough to execute.
    Liptak A
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Feb; ():A1, A27. PubMed ID: 12812158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Individualizing justice after Atkins.
    Brakel SJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(1):103-4. PubMed ID: 16585243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Commentary: Atkins on a diet--a fit but lean guide for policy-makers.
    Fitch WL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):314-6. PubMed ID: 15515921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
    Cantor JD
    Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The need to commute the death sentence: competency for execution and ethical dilemmas for mental health professionals.
    Wallace DH
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(3):317-37. PubMed ID: 1399188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Role of psychiatrists in capital punishment cases : a review].
    Nakajima N
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 11985117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In the public interest: intellectual disability, the Supreme Court, and the death penalty.
    Abeles N
    Am Psychol; 2010 Nov; 65(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21058775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hall v. Florida: Capital Punishment, IQ, and Persons With Intellectual Disabilities.
    Cooke BK; Delalot D; Werner TL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Jun; 43(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 26071514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.