146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10987329)
1. Study design in the evaluation of breast cancer imaging technologies.
Houn F; Bright RA; Bushar HF; Croft BY; Finder CA; Gohagan JK; Jennings RJ; Keegan P; Kessler LG; Kramer BS; Martynec LO; Robinowitz M; Sacks WM; Schultz DG; Wagner RF
Acad Radiol; 2000 Sep; 7(9):684-92. PubMed ID: 10987329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Satisfying the requirements of the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services.
Smith JJ; Henderson JA
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Mar; 5(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 18312966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
Higashida RT; Furlan AJ; Roberts H; Tomsick T; Connors B; Barr J; Dillon W; Warach S; Broderick J; Tilley B; Sacks D; ;
Stroke; 2003 Aug; 34(8):e109-37. PubMed ID: 12869717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of diagnostic imaging technologies and therapeutics devices: better information for better decisions: proceedings of a multidisciplinary workshop.
Califf RM;
Am Heart J; 2006 Jul; 152(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 16824831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Design of evaluations of imaging technologies: development of a paradigm.
Gatsonis C
Acad Radiol; 2000 Sep; 7(9):681-3. PubMed ID: 10987328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Integration of new technology into clinical practice after FDA approval.
Govil A; Hao SC
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Oct; 47(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 27565971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Case studies on forecasting for innovative technologies: frequent revisions improve accuracy.
Lerner JC; Robertson DC; Goldstein SM
Health Aff (Millwood); 2015 Feb; 34(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 25646112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating imaging and computer-aided detection and diagnosis devices at the FDA.
Gallas BD; Chan HP; D'Orsi CJ; Dodd LE; Giger ML; Gur D; Krupinski EA; Metz CE; Myers KJ; Obuchowski NA; Sahiner B; Toledano AY; Zuley ML
Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):463-77. PubMed ID: 22306064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Food and Drug Administration and atrial defibrillation devices.
Chen L; Keane AT; Every NR
Am J Manag Care; 1999 Jul; 5(7):899-909. PubMed ID: 10557410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experiences with evaluating the safety and efficacy of medical technologies.
Moses LE; Brown BW
Annu Rev Public Health; 1984; 5():267-92. PubMed ID: 6372811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic kits in parasitology: which controls?].
Rossi P
Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):145-9. PubMed ID: 15305705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standards of evidence for the safety and effectiveness of critical care monitoring devices and related interventions. Coalition for Critical Care Excellence: Consensus Conference on Physiologic Monitoring Devices.
Crit Care Med; 1995 Oct; 23(10):1756-63. PubMed ID: 7587243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New technology in electrophysiology: FDA process and perspective.
Selzman KA; Fellman M; Farb A; de Del Castillo S; Zuckerman B
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Oct; 47(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 27020440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pivotal trials of orthopedic surgical devices in the United States: predominance of two-arm non-inferiority designs.
Golish SR
Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):348. PubMed ID: 28738891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiological Medical Device Innovation: Approvals via the Premarket Approval Pathway From 2000 to 2015.
Ghobadi CW; Hayman EL; Finkle JH; Walter JR; Xu S
J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Jan; 14(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 28061962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling for health care and other policy decisions: uses, roles, and validity.
Weinstein MC; Toy EL; Sandberg EA; Neumann PJ; Evans JS; Kuntz KM; Graham JD; Hammitt JK
Value Health; 2001; 4(5):348-61. PubMed ID: 11705125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FDA, CE mark or something else?-Thinking fast and slow.
Mishra S
Indian Heart J; 2017; 69(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 28228288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology.
Hunink MG; Krestin GP
Radiology; 2002 Mar; 222(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 11867773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for preoperative evaluation in patients with localized breast cancer.
Tecnologica MAP Suppl; 2000 Sep; ():17-20. PubMed ID: 11511076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
