250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10987622)
1. Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model.
Niemann JT; Burian D; Garner D; Lewis RJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Sep; 36(3):932-8. PubMed ID: 10987622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Left ventricular function after monophasic and biphasic waveform defibrillation: the impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation time on contractile indices.
Niemann JT; Garner D; Lewis RJ
Acad Emerg Med; 2003 Jan; 10(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 12511308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial function.
Tang W; Weil MH; Sun S; Yamaguchi H; Povoas HP; Pernat AM; Bisera J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 34(3):815-22. PubMed ID: 10483965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transthoracic monophasic and biphasic defibrillation in a swine model: a comparison of efficacy, ST segment changes, and postshock hemodynamics.
Niemann JT; Burian D; Garner D; Lewis RJ
Resuscitation; 2000 Sep; 47(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 11004381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transthoracic biphasic waveform defibrillation at very high and very low energies: a comparison with monophasic waveforms in an animal model of ventricular fibrillation.
Clark CB; Zhang Y; Davies LR; Karlsson G; Kerber RE
Resuscitation; 2002 Aug; 54(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 12161298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immediate countershock versus cardiopulmonary resuscitation before countershock in a 5-minute swine model of ventricular fibrillation arrest.
Niemann JT; Cruz B; Garner D; Lewis RJ
Ann Emerg Med; 2000 Dec; 36(6):543-6. PubMed ID: 11097692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of biphasic and monophasic waveform defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation.
Tang W; Weil MH; Sun S; Povoas HP; Klouche K; Kamohara T; Bisera J
Chest; 2001 Sep; 120(3):948-54. PubMed ID: 11555534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective, randomised and blinded comparison of first shock success of monophasic and biphasic waveforms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
van Alem AP; Chapman FW; Lank P; Hart AA; Koster RW
Resuscitation; 2003 Jul; 58(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 12867305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interactions between CPR and defibrillation waveforms: effect on resumption of a perfusing rhythm after defibrillation.
Garcia LA; Allan JJ; Kerber RE
Resuscitation; 2000 Nov; 47(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 11114460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biphasic and monophasic transthoracic defibrillation in pigs with acute left ventricular dysfunction.
Zhang Y; Karlsson G; Davies LR; Coddington WJ; Kerber RE
Resuscitation; 2001 Jul; 50(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 11719135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pediatric transthoracic defibrillation: biphasic versus monophasic waveforms in an experimental model.
Clark CB; Zhang Y; Davies LR; Karlsson G; Kerber RE
Resuscitation; 2001 Nov; 51(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 11718971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early out-of-hospital experience with an impedance-compensating low-energy biphasic waveform automatic external defibrillator.
White RD
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1997 Nov; 1(3):203-8; discussion 209-10. PubMed ID: 9869972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for external defibrillation. Physio-Control Biphasic Investigators.
Higgins SL; Herre JM; Epstein AE; Greer GS; Friedman PL; Gleva ML; Porterfield JG; Chapman FW; Finkel ES; Schmitt PW; Nova RC; Greene HL
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2000; 4(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 11045408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defibrillation waveform and post-shock rhythm in out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.
Carpenter J; Rea TD; Murray JA; Kudenchuk PJ; Eisenberg MS
Resuscitation; 2003 Nov; 59(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 14625109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of lower-energy biphasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a follow-up clinical study.
Higgins SL; O'Grady SG; Banville I; Chapman FW; Schmitt PW; Lank P; Walker RG; Ilina M
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2004; 8(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 15295725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External exponential biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform: efficacy in ventricular fibrillation of longer duration.
Yamanouchi Y; Brewer JE; Donohoo AM; Mowrey KA; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 22(10):1481-7. PubMed ID: 10588150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate defibrillation versus interventions first in a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation.
Menegazzi JJ; Wang HE; Lightfoot CB; Fertig KC; Chengelis NL; Sherman LD; Callaway CW
Resuscitation; 2003 Nov; 59(2):261-70. PubMed ID: 14625118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Resuscitation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation with use of monophasic and biphasic waveform pulses for external defibrillation.
Leng CT; Paradis NA; Calkins H; Berger RD; Lardo AC; Rent KC; Halperin HR
Circulation; 2000 Jun; 101(25):2968-74. PubMed ID: 10869271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pediatric defibrillation doses often fail to terminate prolonged out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in children.
Berg MD; Samson RA; Meyer RJ; Clark LL; Valenzuela TD; Berg RA
Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16199288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Precountershock cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves ventricular fibrillation median frequency and myocardial readiness for successful defibrillation from prolonged ventricular fibrillation: a randomized, controlled swine study.
Berg RA; Hilwig RW; Kern KB; Ewy GA
Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Dec; 40(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 12447331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
