These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10987760)

  • 21. By the london post. A profession in distress.
    Lister J
    N Engl J Med; 1976 Jan; 294(5):265-7. PubMed ID: 1244553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. By the London Post. Prospects for private practice--better terms for doctors?--Brave struggle.
    Lister J
    N Engl J Med; 1978 Jul; 299(4):186-8. PubMed ID: 351399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Editorial: Bad to worse.
    Lancet; 1975 Mar; 1(7908):671. PubMed ID: 47090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Private medical practice and the National Health Service.
    Lister J
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Oct; 311(16):1057-61. PubMed ID: 6482919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Political pressures on an ailing health service.
    Lister J
    N Engl J Med; 1974 Sep; 291(13):667-9. PubMed ID: 4853685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Professional self respect. Professional foul?
    Goolamali SK
    BMJ; 1999 Mar; 318(7185):734. PubMed ID: 10074030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Consultants' contracts. On the line.
    Moore W
    Health Serv J; 1999 Feb; 109(5641):20-2. PubMed ID: 10387209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Going private--a comparison of management in public and private health care.
    Williams L
    Hosp Health Serv Rev; 1984 Mar; 80(2):72-4. PubMed ID: 10266168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What can consultants expect from the Griffiths report?
    Bolt D
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Oct; 289(6452):1159-60. PubMed ID: 6435811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Editorial: Professional independence at stake.
    Br Med J; 1974 Nov; 4(5941):363. PubMed ID: 4425881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. NHS and private sector have a lot to learn from each other.
    Chudley P
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1983 May; (297):8. PubMed ID: 6552686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. By the London post. The end of medical dominance? -- Great characters -- A blow to golf.
    Lister J
    N Engl J Med; 1975 Apr; 292(17):906-8. PubMed ID: 1090828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Private healthcare. Let's drink to that.
    Higgins J
    Health Serv J; 2001 Jan; 111(5737):22-4. PubMed ID: 11215074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. UK experience confirms the worst of Howard's IR agenda.
    Jones S
    Aust Nurs J; 2006 Sep; 14(3):3. PubMed ID: 16991232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The problem of privatisation.
    Paine L
    Hosp Health Serv Rev; 1983 Sep; 79(5):205-7. PubMed ID: 10263829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What I would say to the Royal Commission. Compelling needs of our hospitals.
    Elderkin M
    Br Med J; 1976 Oct; 2(6040):864-5. PubMed ID: 990726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. NHS review: healthy competition?
    McNally M
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Feb; 3(19):8-9. PubMed ID: 2494536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Private practice: answer or irrelevance?
    Maynard A
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Jun; 288(6433):1849-51. PubMed ID: 6428572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Editorial: Ban the ban.
    Lancet; 1976 Jan; 1(7949):23. PubMed ID: 54521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Private practice and the reduction of pay-beds.
    Shipman JJ; Giles KW; Ryan AR; Lancaster JM; Sutherland DR; Sandhu BS; McCallum IJ
    Br Med J; 1978 Nov; 2(6147):1304. PubMed ID: 709344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.