198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10989479)
1. Transfemoral socket design and suspension options.
Kapp SL
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):569-83, vi. PubMed ID: 10989479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Below knee prosthetic socket designs and suspension systems.
Edwards ML
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):585-93, vi. PubMed ID: 10989480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The latest designs in prosthetic feet.
Nassan S
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):609-25. PubMed ID: 10989482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prosthetic knees.
Romo HD
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):595-607, vii. PubMed ID: 10989481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Upper extremity socket design options.
Daly W
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):627-38. PubMed ID: 10989483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics-socket interface: a review.
Mak AF; Zhang M; Boone DA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 11392649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transfemoral sockets with vacuum-assisted suspension comparison of hip kinematics, socket position, contact pressure, and preference: ischial containment versus brimless.
Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(9):1241-52. PubMed ID: 24458964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New concepts in lower limb orthotics.
Loke M
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):477-96, v. PubMed ID: 10989474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Custom design in lower limb prosthetics for athletic activity.
Fergason JR; Boone DA
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):681-99. PubMed ID: 10989486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ankle-knee synchronous in a new endoskeletal above-knee prosthetic mechanism: a preliminary report.
Li WK
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1976 Oct; 57(10):479-81. PubMed ID: 973790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element modeling of the contact interface between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket.
Lee WC; Zhang M; Jia X; Cheung JT
Med Eng Phys; 2004 Oct; 26(8):655-62. PubMed ID: 15471693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of the transfemoral prosthetic socket interface designs on skeletal motion and socket comfort: A randomized clinical trial.
Kahle J; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter M; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Highsmith J; Highsmith MJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):145-154. PubMed ID: 32308126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design, fabrication, and preliminary results of a novel below-knee prosthesis for snowboarding: A case report.
Minnoye SL; Plettenburg DH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Sep; 33(3):272-83. PubMed ID: 19658016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interface pressures in above-knee sockets.
Krouskop TA; Brown J; Goode B; Winningham D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Oct; 68(10):713-4. PubMed ID: 3662780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pediatric prosthetics. Current trends and future possibilities.
Cummings DR
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):653-79. PubMed ID: 10989485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transfemoral prosthesis suspension systems: a systematic review of the literature.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 93(9):809-23. PubMed ID: 24743451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Energy cost of walking in transfemoral amputees: Comparison between Marlo Anatomical Socket and Ischial Containment Socket.
Traballesi M; Delussu AS; Averna T; Pellegrini R; Paradisi F; Brunelli S
Gait Posture; 2011 Jun; 34(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 21684165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current concepts in above-knee socket design.
Michael JW
Instr Course Lect; 1990; 39():373-8. PubMed ID: 2186127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Static and dynamic pressure prediction for prosthetic socket fitting assessment utilising an inverse problem approach.
Sewell P; Noroozi S; Vinney J; Amali R; Andrews S
Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jan; 54(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 21963113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts.
Dumbleton T; Buis AW; McFadyen A; McHugh BF; McKay G; Murray KD; Sexton S
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 19675992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
