198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10989479)
21. Current transfemoral sockets.
Schuch CM; Pritham CH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Apr; (361):48-54. PubMed ID: 10212595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Generic, geometric finite element analysis of the transtibial residual limb and prosthetic socket.
Silver-Thorn MB; Childress DS
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Apr; 34(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 9108344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Developments in orthotic deweighting technology.
Goss J
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):497-508, v. PubMed ID: 10989475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. New Socket-Less Prosthesis concept facilitating comfortable and abrasion-free cycling after Van Nes rotationplasty.
Scheepers LG; Storcken JO; Rings F; van Horn Y; Seelen HA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Apr; 39(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 24429482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees.
Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J; Pros D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 17532907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Three-dimensional finite element analyses on the transtibial residual limb and its prosthetic socket].
Zhang M; Mak AF; Fan Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Dec; 17(4):403-6. PubMed ID: 11211825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Real-time patient-specific finite element analysis of internal stresses in the soft tissues of a residual limb: a new tool for prosthetic fitting.
Portnoy S; Yarnitzky G; Yizhar Z; Kristal A; Oppenheim U; Siev-Ner I; Gefen A
Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 35(1):120-35. PubMed ID: 17120139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Elderly unilateral transtibial amputee gait on an inclined walkway: a biomechanical analysis.
Vickers DR; Palk C; McIntosh AS; Beatty KT
Gait Posture; 2008 Apr; 27(3):518-29. PubMed ID: 17707643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computer-aided design of a prosthetic socket for an above-knee amputee.
Krouskop TA; Muilenberg AL; Doughtery DR; Winningham DJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(2):31-8. PubMed ID: 3585783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparative study of oxygen consumption for conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in transfemoral amputees.
Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J
Clin Rehabil; 2008; 22(10-11):896-901. PubMed ID: 18955421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effects of prosthetic foot roll-over shape arc length on the gait of trans-tibial prosthesis users.
Hansen AH; Meier MR; Sessoms PH; Childress DS
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Dec; 30(3):286-99. PubMed ID: 17162519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Upper extremity myoelectric prosthetics.
Uellendahl JE
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):639-52. PubMed ID: 10989484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Integration of surface electromyographic sensors with the transfemoral amputee socket: a comparison of four differing configurations.
Hefferman GM; Zhang F; Nunnery MJ; Huang H
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Apr; 39(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 24469430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative analysis of interface pressures in transfemoral prosthetic sockets.
Paternò L; Truppa L; Ibrahimi M; Rosini E; Gruppioni E; Ricotti L; Menciassi A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Apr; 48(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 37379468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improved comfort and function of arm prosthesis after implantation of a Humerus-T-Prosthesis in trans-humeral amputees.
Witsø E; Kristensen T; Benum P; Sivertsen S; Persen L; Funderud A; Magne T; Aursand HP; Aamodt A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Dec; 30(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 17162517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A finite element analysis of the load transfer between an above-knee residual limb and its prosthetic socket--roles of interface friction and distal-end boundary conditions.
Zhang M; Mak AF
IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1996 Dec; 4(4):337-46. PubMed ID: 8973960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical design considerations for transradial prosthetic interface: A review.
Sang Y; Li X; Luo Y
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Mar; 230(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 26759485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits.
Au S; Berniker M; Herr H
Neural Netw; 2008 May; 21(4):654-66. PubMed ID: 18499394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of different types of sockets on the range of motion of the hip joint by the transfemoral amputee.
Klotz R; Colobert B; Botino M; Permentiers I
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Oct; 54(7):399-410. PubMed ID: 21996548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets.
Beil TL; Street GM; Covey SJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 17943671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
