These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1098998)
1. Fetal experimentation: an evaluation of the new federal norms. O'Rourke KD Hosp Prog; 1975 Sep; 56(9):60-9. PubMed ID: 1098998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The cost of fetal research: ethical considerations. Tiefel HO N Engl J Med; 1976 Jan; 294(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 1244505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal tissue research: legal regulation of human fetal tissue transplantation. Gelfand G; Levin TR Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):647-94. PubMed ID: 11656327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New human subjects rule for pregnant women and fetuses. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Mar; 16(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 11933950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols. Gorenberg H; White A Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An ethical evaluation of federal norms for fetal experimentation. O'Rourke KD Linacre Q; 1976 Feb; 43(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11663671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Position statement of the American Federation for Clinical Research on the DHEW proposed rules on protection of human subjects. Levine RJ; Kreisberg RA Clin Res; 1975 Feb; 23(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 10297148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective. Bagley G Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal experimentation: moral, legal, and medical implications. Reback GL Stanford Law Rev; 1974 May; 26(5):1191-207. PubMed ID: 11663472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal experimentation: protocols, propriety and parameters. Meechan CM Queens Law J; 1985; 11(1):166-97. PubMed ID: 11659023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Final rule on additional protections for women. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2002 Jan; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 16270436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The future of fetal research in California: a proposal for change. Lehmann PL San Diego Law Rev; 1978 Jul; 15(4):859-86. PubMed ID: 11664975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Can a court order participation in research? Holder AR IRB; 1987; 9(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 11649949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy. Haley JN Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. State prohibition of fetal experimentation and the fundamental right of privacy. Clapp MJ Columbia Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 88(5):1073-97. PubMed ID: 11659043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent for research on specimens obtained at autopsy or surgery: a case study in the overprotection of human subjects. Holder AR; Levine RJ Clin Res; 1976 Feb; 24(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 10316498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]