These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10991724)
1. Scientific publishing. Chemists toy with the preprint future. Service RF Science; 2000 Sep; 289(5484):1445-6. PubMed ID: 10991724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Describing the Landscape of Medical Education Preprints on MedRxiv: Current Trends and Future Recommendations. Maggio LA; Costello JA; Artino AR Acad Med; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38619532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The future of scientific journals. A computer-based system will enable a subscriber to receive a personalized stream of papers. Brown WS; Pierce JR; Traub JF Science; 1967 Dec; 158(3805):1153-9. PubMed ID: 6057288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific publishing. Researchers plan free global preprint archive. Marshall E Science; 1999 Oct; 286(5441):887. PubMed ID: 10577235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal. Nielsen MB; Seitz K Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. US biologists propose launch of electronic preprint archive. Butler D Nature; 1999 Jan; 397(6715):91. PubMed ID: 9923663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article. Fu DY; Hughey JJ Elife; 2019 Dec; 8():. PubMed ID: 31808742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rise of the Rxivs: How Preprint Servers are Changing the Publishing Process. Hoy MB Med Ref Serv Q; 2020; 39(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 32069196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The experiences of COVID-19 preprint authors: a survey of researchers about publishing and receiving feedback on their work during the pandemic. Rzayeva N; Henriques SO; Pinfield S; Waltman L PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15864. PubMed ID: 37637174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of an experimental chemistry preprint server. Warr WA J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):362-73. PubMed ID: 12653498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Beyond scoops to best practices. Marder E Elife; 2017 Jul; 6():. PubMed ID: 28696206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints. Abdill RJ; Blekhman R Elife; 2019 Apr; 8():. PubMed ID: 31017570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Plan U: Universal access to scientific and medical research via funder preprint mandates. Sever R; Eisen M; Inglis J PLoS Biol; 2019 Jun; 17(6):e3000273. PubMed ID: 31163026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The emergence of preprints for Brazilian science: considerations from the Nursing area. Souza JRDS Rev Esc Enferm USP; 2019; 53():e03534. PubMed ID: 31851281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Electronic medical journals are a reality of today]. Drbálek J Sb Lek; 1999; 100(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 11221472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electronic publishing: the movement from print to digital publication. Ludwick R; Glazer G Online J Issues Nurs; 2000; 5(1):2. PubMed ID: 11453839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rxivist.org: Sorting biology preprints using social media and readership metrics. Abdill RJ; Blekhman R PLoS Biol; 2019 May; 17(5):e3000269. PubMed ID: 31112533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development, implementation and impact of a new preprint solicitation process at Neiman M; Bagley RK; Paczesniak D; Singh-Shepherd S Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jul; 288(1954):20211248. PubMed ID: 34256003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]