These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10992106)

  • 1. [Quantitative risk assessment related to microbial food contamination] [In Process Citation].
    Sanaa M; Bemrah N; Meyer S; Cerf O; Mohammed H
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Aug; 48(## Suppl 2):11-22. PubMed ID: 10992106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quantitative risk assessment related to microbial food contamination].
    Sanaa M; Bemrah N; Meyer S; Cerf O; Mohammed H
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Aug; 48 Suppl 2():2S11-24. PubMed ID: 11183481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The application of quantitative risk assessment to microbial food safety risks.
    Jaykus LA
    Crit Rev Microbiol; 1996; 22(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 8989514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk characterisation of chemicals in food.
    Renwick AG
    Toxicol Lett; 2004 Apr; 149(1-3):163-76. PubMed ID: 15093262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quantitative risk assessment of environmental health hazards: exposure,risk and hazard].
    Szymczak W; Indulski J; Barański B
    Med Pr; 1993; 44(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 8377642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk assessment for infectious foodborne diseases: a priority with problems.
    Potter ME; Brudney JL
    J Agromedicine; 2004; 9(2):59-69. PubMed ID: 19785206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative risk assessment from farm to fork and beyond: a global Bayesian approach concerning food-borne diseases.
    Albert I; Grenier E; Denis JB; Rousseau J
    Risk Anal; 2008 Apr; 28(2):557-71. PubMed ID: 18419669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk assessment strategies for Europe: integrated safety strategy or final product control: Example of Listeria monocytogenes in processed products from pork meat industry.
    Salvat G; Fravalo P
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004 Aug; 111(8):331-4. PubMed ID: 15469063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Monitoring and risk assessment of campylobacter infections].
    Bartelt E
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004 Aug; 111(8):326-31. PubMed ID: 15469062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A tiered approach for risk-benefit assessment of foods.
    Fransen H; de Jong N; Hendriksen M; Mengelers M; Castenmiller J; Hoekstra J; van Leeuwen R; Verhagen H
    Risk Anal; 2010 May; 30(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 20136741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chemical risk assessment: a review.
    Hopper LD; Oehme FW
    Vet Hum Toxicol; 1989 Dec; 31(6):543-54. PubMed ID: 2694585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listeria monocytogenes and listeriosis: a review of hazard characterisation for use in microbiological risk assessment of foods.
    McLauchlin J; Mitchell RT; Smerdon WJ; Jewell K
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(1):15-33. PubMed ID: 15033265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A risk assessment approach applied to the growth of Erwinia carotovora in vegetable juice for variable temperature conditions.
    Shorten PR; Soboleva TK; Pleasants AB; Membré JM
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 May; 109(1-2):60-70. PubMed ID: 16507324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative risk assessment of Campylobacter spp. in poultry based meat preparations as one of the factors to support the development of risk-based microbiological criteria in Belgium.
    Uyttendaele M; Baert K; Ghafir Y; Daube G; De Zutter L; Herman L; Dierick K; Pierard D; Dubois JJ; Horion B; Debevere J
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 111(2):149-63. PubMed ID: 16876277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a quantitative microbial risk assessment for human salmonellosis through household consumption of fresh minced pork meat in Belgium.
    Bollaerts KE; Messens W; Delhalle L; Aerts M; Van der Stede Y; Dewulf J; Quoilin S; Maes D; Mintiens K; Grijspeerdt K
    Risk Anal; 2009 Jun; 29(6):820-40. PubMed ID: 19392678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the probability and level of contamination with Salmonella of feed for finishing pigs produced in Switzerland--the impact of the production pathway.
    Sauli I; Danuser J; Geeraerd AH; Van Impe JF; Rüfenacht J; Bissig-Choisat B; Wenk C; Stärk KD
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 100(1-3):289-310. PubMed ID: 15854713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The concept of risk and its estimation].
    Zocchetti C; Della Foglia M; Colombi A
    Med Lav; 1996; 87(4):330-47. PubMed ID: 9102559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling logistic performance in quantitative microbial risk assessment.
    Rijgersberg H; Tromp S; Jacxsens L; Uyttendaele M
    Risk Anal; 2010 Jan; 30(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 20055976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying human health risks from virginiamycin used in chickens.
    Cox LA; Popken DA
    Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):271-88. PubMed ID: 15028017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Dose-response-models and their implications for quantitative risk assessment for Campylobacter infections].
    Stellbrink E; Dahms S
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004; 117(5-6):207-13. PubMed ID: 15188680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.