These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10992169)
1. De novo adhesions with extraperitoneal endosurgical para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus transperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: a randomized experimental study. Occelli B; Narducci F; Lanvin D; Querleu D; Coste E; Castelain B; Gibon D; LeBlanc E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 183(3):529-33. PubMed ID: 10992169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: randomized experimental study]. Occelli B; Narducci F; Lanvin D; Coste E; Legoupils E; Castelain B; Querleu D Ann Chir; 2000 Jan; 125(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 10921179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pelvic adhesion formation after pelvic lymphadenectomy: comparison between transperitoneal laparoscopy and extraperitoneal laparotomy in a porcine model. Fowler JM; Hartenbach EM; Reynolds HT; Borner J; Carter JR; Carlson JW; Twiggs LB; Carson LF Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Oct; 55(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 7959261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical development and results of left extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Dargent D; Ansquer Y; Mathevet P Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 10739695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy. Nagao S; Fujiwara K; Kagawa R; Kozuka Y; Oda T; Maehata K; Ishikawa H; Koike H; Kohno I Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):732-5. PubMed ID: 16808966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: an evaluation of adhesion formation after pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in a porcine model. Chen MD; Teigen GA; Reynolds HT; Johnson PR; Fowler JM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Mar; 178(3):499-503. PubMed ID: 9539516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and safety of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy: an experimental prospective randomized study. Lanvin D; Elhage A; Henry B; Leblanc E; Querleu D; Delobelle-Deroide A Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 9345361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients. Hudry D; Ahmad S; Zanagnolo V; Narducci F; Fastrez M; Ponce J; Tucher E; Lécuru F; Conri V; Leguevaque P; Goffin F; Holloway RW; Lambaudie E; Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Mar; 25(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 25628104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning curve of laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma: A cumulative sum analysis. Yoshida H; Yamamoto M; Shigeta H Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 35():254-260. PubMed ID: 32932223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies. Köhler C; Klemm P; Schau A; Possover M; Krause N; Tozzi R; Schneider A Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 15385110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]