These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1099237)

  • 21. On-line control of a SBR system for nitrogen removal from industrial wastewater.
    Andreottola G; Foladori P; Ragazzi M
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(3):93-100. PubMed ID: 11381938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Removal of excess activated sludge by aerobic mineralization.
    Lopatowska K
    Acta Microbiol Pol; 1984; 33(3-4):263-70. PubMed ID: 6083711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nutrient minimisation in the pulp and paper industry: an overview.
    Slade AH; Ellis RJ; vanden Heuvel M; Stuthridge TR
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(3):111-22. PubMed ID: 15461405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nutrients removal in MBRs for municipal wastewater treatment.
    Kraume M; Bracklow U; Vocks M; Drews A
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):391-402. PubMed ID: 16004001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Carbon source recovery from waste activated sludge by alkaline hydrolysis and gamma-ray irradiation for biological denitrification.
    Kim TH; Nam YK; Park C; Lee M
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(23):5694-9. PubMed ID: 19596570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The ScanDeNi process could turn an existing under-performing activated sludge plant into an asset.
    Rosén S; Huijbregsen C
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):31-6. PubMed ID: 12906268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of microbiological hydrolysis of urea on the nitrification process.
    Krogulska B; Rekosz H; Mycielski R
    Acta Microbiol Pol; 1983; 32(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 6202105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Phosphorus removal from SBR with controlled denitrification for weak sewage.
    Choi E; Park H; Rhu D
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 11381900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Activated sludge.
    Azad HS; Hayden PL
    J Water Pollut Control Fed; 1972 Jun; 44(6):925-34. PubMed ID: 4556363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal under intermittent aeration conditions.
    Xia SQ; Gao TY; Zhou ZY
    J Environ Sci (China); 2002 Oct; 14(4):541-6. PubMed ID: 12491730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experience with phosphorus removal and sludge handling and disposal in Flanders.
    Bixio D; Boonen I; Thoeye C; De Gueldre G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 16235742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A modification to the Activated Sludge Model No. 2 based on the competition between phosphorus-accumulating organisms and glycogen-accumulating organisms.
    Manga J; Ferrer J; Garcia-Usach F; Seco A
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(11):161-71. PubMed ID: 11443958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Simultaneous carbon, nitrogen and phosphorous removal from municipal wastewater in a circulating fluidized bed bioreactor.
    Patel A; Zhu J; Nakhla G
    Chemosphere; 2006 Nov; 65(7):1103-12. PubMed ID: 16762392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Removal of biogenic elements, polychlorinated diphenyls and heavy metals during the biological final treatment of waste-waters.
    Wéber K; Prokeś B; Lívanský K; Krédl F; Beryl I
    Acta Microbiol Pol; 1981; 30(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 6174027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative performance evaluation of full-scale anaerobic and aerobic wastewater treatment processes in Brazil.
    von Sperling M; Oliveira SC
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 19151481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of hydrothermal reaction for excess sludge reuse as carbon sources in biological phosphorus removal.
    Kim K; Fujita M; Daimon H; Fujie K
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):533-41. PubMed ID: 16459831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimisation of Noosa BNR plant to improve performance and reduce operating costs.
    Thomas M; Wright P; Blackall L; Urbain V; Keller J
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):141-8. PubMed ID: 12926681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of conventional activated sludge and low sludge production strategies for advanced treatment of kraft pulp mill effluent.
    Werker A; Malmqvist A; Welander T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(3):103-10. PubMed ID: 15461404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Hygiene problems associated with characteristics of the sludge from purification plants in Liguria].
    Kanitz S; Rizzetto R; Patrone V; Franco Y; La Rocca MC; Roveta M; Parodi F; Pasero V
    Ann Ig; 1989; 1(3-4):481-93. PubMed ID: 2483626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Degradation of phthalate esters in an activated sludge wastewater treatment plant.
    Roslev P; Vorkamp K; Aarup J; Frederiksen K; Nielsen PH
    Water Res; 2007 Mar; 41(5):969-76. PubMed ID: 17258263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.