158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10992376)
1. In vitro comparison of shock wave lithotripsy machines.
Teichman JM; Portis AJ; Cecconi PP; Bub WL; Endicott RC; Denes B; Pearle MS; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2000 Oct; 164(4):1259-64. PubMed ID: 10992376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro calcium oxalate lithotripsy: comparison of Dornier HM3 and Siemens Lithostar.
Hollander JB; Van Horn AC; Knapp PM
J Endourol; 1993 Dec; 7(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 8124337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Matched pair analysis of shock wave lithotripsy effectiveness for comparison of lithotriptors.
Portis AJ; Yan Y; Pattaras JG; Andreoni C; Moore R; Clayman R
J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 12478102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Second generation shock wave lithotripsy: experience with the Siemens Lithostar].
Ben A; Tanaka T; Shiraiwa K; Kobayashi S; Kikuyama A; Magome A; Kawamura K; Yamaguchi C; Ehara T; Miyazawa K
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1989 Dec; 35(12):2099-105. PubMed ID: 2618910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of shock wave lithotripsy injury in the pig using a narrow focal zone lithotriptor.
Connors BA; McAteer JA; Evan AP; Blomgren PM; Handa RK; Johnson CD; Gao S; Pishchalnikov YA; Lingeman JE
BJU Int; 2012 Nov; 110(9):1376-85. PubMed ID: 22519983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is newer always better? A comparative study of 3 lithotriptor generations.
Gerber R; Studer UE; Danuser H
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2013-6. PubMed ID: 15879807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with a transportable electrohydraulic lithotripter: experience with >300 patients.
Albala DM; Siddiqui KM; Fulmer B; Alioto J; Frankel J; Monga M
BJU Int; 2005 Sep; 96(4):603-7. PubMed ID: 16104918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.
De Sio M; Autorino R; Quarto G; Mordente S; Giugliano F; Di Giacomo F; Neri F; Quattrone C; Sorrentino D; De Domenico R; D'Armiento M
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 17550410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of synchronous twin pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: determination of optimal parameters for in vitro stone fragmentation.
Sheir KZ; Zabihi N; Lee D; Teichman JM; Rehman J; Sundaram CP; Heimbach D; Hesse A; Delvecchio F; Zhong P; Preminger GM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2190-4. PubMed ID: 14634376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for difficult common bile duct stones: a comparison between 2 different lithotripters in a large cohort of patients.
Cecinato P; Fuccio L; Azzaroli F; Lisotti A; Correale L; Hassan C; Buonfiglioli F; Cariani G; Mazzella G; Bazzoli F; Muratori R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Feb; 81(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 24973175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized trial comparing 2 lithotriptors for stone disintegration and induced renal trauma.
Graber SF; Danuser H; Hochreiter WW; Studer UE
J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 12478101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of pancreatic duct stones using the Healthtronics LithoTron lithotriptor and the Dornier HM3 lithotripsy machine.
Rubenstein JN; Parsons WG; Kim SC; Weiser AC; Loor MM; Kube DS; Nadler RB
J Urol; 2002 Feb; 167(2 Pt 1):485-7. PubMed ID: 11792902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of mobile lithotripters at one institution: healthtronics lithotron, Dornier MFL-5000, and Dornier Doli.
Fuselier HA; Prats L; Fontenot C; Gauthier A
J Endourol; 1999 Oct; 13(8):539-42. PubMed ID: 10597121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of first-generation (Dornier HM3) and second-generation (Medstone STS) lithotripters: treatment results with 145 renal and ureteral calculi in children.
Cass AS
J Endourol; 1996 Dec; 10(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 8972780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of first generation (Dornier HM3) and second generation (Medstone STS) lithotriptors: treatment results with 13,864 renal and ureteral calculi.
Cass AS
J Urol; 1995 Mar; 153(3 Pt 1):588-92. PubMed ID: 7861488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy.
Zhou Y; Cocks FH; Preminger GM; Zhong P
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):349-54. PubMed ID: 15201809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In Vitro Assessment of Three Clinical Lithotripters Employing Different Shock Wave Generators.
Faragher SR; Cleveland RO; Kumar S; Wiseman OJ; Turney BW
J Endourol; 2016 May; 30(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 26918374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative analysis of lithiasic fragmentation induced by extracorporeal and direct contact sources].
Burgos Revilla FJ; Saez Garrido JC; Mayayo Dehesa T; Páramo de Santiago P; Platas Sancho A; Díez Yanguas J; Lovaco Castellanos F; Avila S; Sánchez Corral J; Minaya A
Arch Esp Urol; 1993; 46(6):485-96. PubMed ID: 8379699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Treatment of childhood lithiasis using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].
Gómez Pascual JA; Lopez Rueda B; Soler Martínez J; Llerena Hoyos M; García Galisteo E; Díaz Ramírez F; del Rosal Samaniego JM; Baena González V
Arch Esp Urol; 2003 Oct; 56(8):927-32. PubMed ID: 14639848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. A brief review of the types of equipment currently in use].
Auvert J
Ann Urol (Paris); 1995; 29(6-7):355-6. PubMed ID: 8687172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
