These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10992672)
1. U.S. health care after Pegram: betrayal at the bedside? Bloche MG Health Aff (Millwood); 2000; 19(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 10992672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme Court refuses to "precipitate the upheaval" in Pegram v. Herdrich. Torrance AB Health Care Law Mon; 2000 Jul; ():16-8. PubMed ID: 11066640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pegram v. Herdrich. 530 U.S. 211 (2000). Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():159-60. PubMed ID: 12669324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Employer sponsored health benefit plans under ERISA after Pegram v. Herdrich: the fiduciary duty argument and mixed eligibility versus treatment decisions. Karns JE J Law Health; 2000-2001; 15(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11930500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pegram v. Herdrich: The Supreme Court confronts managed care. Jost TS Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():187-93. PubMed ID: 12669328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. UR here: the Supreme Court's guide for managed care. Sage WM Health Aff (Millwood); 2000; 19(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 10992671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pegram v. Herdrich: HMOs aren't perfect, but .. Wahl JR Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 2001; 27(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 12778921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. HMO malpractice: have the floodgates opened? Hansen E Manag Care Interface; 2000 Sep; 13(9):84-6. PubMed ID: 11142969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Law & psychiatry: Pegram v. Herdrich: the Supreme Court passes the buck on managed care. Appelbaum PS Psychiatr Serv; 2000 Oct; 51(10):1225-6, 1238. PubMed ID: 11013317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A perspective from within the white coat. Chow RD Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():171-5. PubMed ID: 12669326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pegram's significance for managed health care. Saccoccio L Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():195-201. PubMed ID: 12669329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dividing loyalties: caring for individuals and populations. Jecker NS Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():177-86. PubMed ID: 12669327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mismanaged care: the challenges facing judicial interpretation of contemporary health policy. Schlesinger M Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():203-13. PubMed ID: 12669330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pegram v. Herdrich: a victory for HMOs or the beginning of the end for ERISA preemption? Borzi PC Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():161-9. PubMed ID: 12669325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. ERISA preemption: will the elimination of the ERISA preemption clause help or harm America's ability to deal with its pending health care crisis? Taylor DH J Law Health; 1999-2000; 14(1):133-78. PubMed ID: 11187365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Workers of the world, panic! Parloff R Fortune; 2004 Jul; 150(1):36, 38. PubMed ID: 15270460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fiduciaries--HMOs--incentives to ration care. Pegram v. Herdrich. Benefits Q; 2001; 17(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 11372475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Litigating around ERISA to quality managed healthcare: an HMO can breach fiduciary duties. Karns JE Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2001 Mar; (263):9-30. PubMed ID: 11291401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Groping for the reins: ERISA, HMO malpractice, and enterprise liability. Kilcullen JK Am J Law Med; 1996; 22(1):7-50. PubMed ID: 8819595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]