BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10993417)

  • 1. Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity.
    Bassett DR; Ainsworth BE; Swartz AM; Strath SJ; O'Brien WL; King GA
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):S471-80. PubMed ID: 10993417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field.
    Hendelman D; Miller K; Baggett C; Debold E; Freedson P
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):S442-9. PubMed ID: 10993413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simultaneous heart rate-motion sensor technique to estimate energy expenditure.
    Strath SJ; Bassett DR; Swartz AM; Thompson DL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Dec; 33(12):2118-23. PubMed ID: 11740308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of uniaxial accelerometry during activities of daily living in children.
    Eisenmann JC; Strath SJ; Shadrick D; Rigsby P; Hirsch N; Jacobson L
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2004 Mar; 91(2-3):259-63. PubMed ID: 14569402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites.
    Swartz AM; Strath SJ; Bassett DR; O'Brien WL; King GA; Ainsworth BE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):S450-6. PubMed ID: 10993414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating energy expenditure using accelerometers.
    Crouter SE; Churilla JR; Bassett DR
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Dec; 98(6):601-12. PubMed ID: 17058102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Field evaluation of energy expenditure in women using Tritrac accelerometers.
    Campbell KL; Crocker PR; McKenzie DC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Oct; 34(10):1667-74. PubMed ID: 12370570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of the simultaneous heart rate-motion sensor technique for measuring energy expenditure.
    Strath SJ; Bassett DR; Thompson DL; Swartz AM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 May; 34(5):888-94. PubMed ID: 11984311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining energy expenditure during some household and garden tasks.
    Gunn SM; Brooks AG; Withers RT; Gore CJ; Owen N; Booth ML; Bauman AE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 May; 34(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 11984312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive validity of three ActiGraph energy expenditure equations for children.
    Trost SG; Way R; Okely AD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 Feb; 38(2):380-7. PubMed ID: 16531910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The energy cost of household and garden activities in 55- to 65-year-old males.
    Gunn SM; Brooks AG; Withers RT; Gore CJ; Plummer JL; Cormack J
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2005 Jul; 94(4):476-86. PubMed ID: 15815941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-selected exercise intensity during household/garden activities and walking in 55 to 65-year-old females.
    Withers RT; Brooks AG; Gunn SM; Plummer JL; Gore CJ; Cormack J
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Jul; 97(4):494-504. PubMed ID: 16767444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors.
    Welk GJ; Blair SN; Wood K; Jones S; Thompson RW
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):S489-97. PubMed ID: 10993419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor.
    Melanson EL; Freedson PS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Jun; 27(6):934-40. PubMed ID: 7658958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity.
    Ainsworth BE; Bassett DR; Strath SJ; Swartz AM; O'Brien WL; Thompson RW; Jones DA; Macera CA; Kimsey CD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):S457-64. PubMed ID: 10993415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical activity monitoring in stroke: SenseWear Pro2 activity accelerometer versus Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200 pedometer.
    Vanroy C; Vissers D; Cras P; Beyne S; Feys H; Vanlandewijck Y; Truijen S
    Disabil Rehabil; 2014; 36(20):1695-703. PubMed ID: 24279597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calorimetric validation of the Caltrac accelerometer during level walking.
    Balogun JA; Martin DA; Clendenin MA
    Phys Ther; 1989 Jun; 69(6):501-9. PubMed ID: 2727075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement and prediction of energy expenditure in males during household and garden tasks.
    Gunn SM; van der Ploeg GE; Withers RT; Gore CJ; Owen N; Bauman AE; Cormack J
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2004 Jan; 91(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 12955520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of accelerometers with oxygen consumption in older adults during exercise.
    Fehling PC; Smith DL; Warner SE; Dalsky GP
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1999 Jan; 31(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 9927026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metabolic Power Method: Underestimation of Energy Expenditure in Field-Sport Movements Using a Global Positioning System Tracking System.
    Brown DM; Dwyer DB; Robertson SJ; Gastin PB
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2016 Nov; 11(8):1067-1073. PubMed ID: 26999381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.