BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10993419)

  • 1. A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors.
    Welk GJ; Blair SN; Wood K; Jones S; Thompson RW
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):S489-97. PubMed ID: 10993419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory calibration and validation of the Biotrainer and Actitrac activity monitors.
    Welk GJ; Almeida J; Morss G
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Jun; 35(6):1057-64. PubMed ID: 12783056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of activity monitors to estimate energy cost of treadmill exercise.
    King GA; Torres N; Potter C; Brooks TJ; Coleman KJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Jul; 36(7):1244-51. PubMed ID: 15235333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of uniaxial accelerometry during activities of daily living in children.
    Eisenmann JC; Strath SJ; Shadrick D; Rigsby P; Hirsch N; Jacobson L
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2004 Mar; 91(2-3):259-63. PubMed ID: 14569402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field.
    Hendelman D; Miller K; Baggett C; Debold E; Freedson P
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):S442-9. PubMed ID: 10993413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children.
    Puyau MR; Adolph AL; Vohra FA; Butte NF
    Obes Res; 2002 Mar; 10(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 11886937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity, reliability, and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometer as a measure of physical activity.
    Nichols JF; Morgan CG; Sarkin JA; Sallis JF; Calfas KJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1999 Jun; 31(6):908-12. PubMed ID: 10378921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity.
    Bassett DR; Ainsworth BE; Swartz AM; Strath SJ; O'Brien WL; King GA
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):S471-80. PubMed ID: 10993417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children.
    Trost SG; Ward DS; Moorehead SM; Watson PD; Riner W; Burke JR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1998 Apr; 30(4):629-33. PubMed ID: 9565947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Field evaluation of energy expenditure in women using Tritrac accelerometers.
    Campbell KL; Crocker PR; McKenzie DC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Oct; 34(10):1667-74. PubMed ID: 12370570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of EPOC adjustment on estimation of energy expenditure using activity monitors.
    Pribyslavska V; Caputo JL; Coons JM; Barry VW
    J Med Eng Technol; 2018 May; 42(4):265-273. PubMed ID: 29911930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Specific Activity Types.
    Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Dickin DC; Montoye AH
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1619-28. PubMed ID: 27015387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of the SenseWear Armband to assess energy expenditure in graded walking.
    Vernillo G; Savoldelli A; Pellegrini B; Schena F
    J Phys Act Health; 2015 Feb; 12(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 24508986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ability of different physical activity monitors to detect movement during treadmill walking.
    Leenders NY; Nelson TE; Sherman WM
    Int J Sports Med; 2003 Jan; 24(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 12582951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons of four methods of estimating physical activity in adult women.
    Leenders NYJM ; Sherman WM; Nagaraja HN
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Jul; 32(7):1320-6. PubMed ID: 10912900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of activity monitors worn at multiple nontraditional locations under controlled and free-living conditions in young adult women.
    Kumahara H; Ayabe M; Ichibakase M; Tashima A; Chiwata M; Takashi T
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2015 May; 40(5):448-56. PubMed ID: 25832964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
    Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
    Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of Wristband Activity Monitors during Ambulation and Activities.
    Chen MD; Kuo CC; Pellegrini CA; Hsu MJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1942-9. PubMed ID: 27183123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors.
    Lee JM; Kim Y; Welk GJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Sep; 46(9):1840-8. PubMed ID: 24777201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of Oura ring energy expenditure and steps in laboratory and free-living.
    Kristiansson E; Fridolfsson J; Arvidsson D; Holmäng A; Börjesson M; Andersson-Hall U
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):50. PubMed ID: 36829120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.