183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10993419)
1. A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors.
Welk GJ; Blair SN; Wood K; Jones S; Thompson RW
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):S489-97. PubMed ID: 10993419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laboratory calibration and validation of the Biotrainer and Actitrac activity monitors.
Welk GJ; Almeida J; Morss G
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Jun; 35(6):1057-64. PubMed ID: 12783056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of activity monitors to estimate energy cost of treadmill exercise.
King GA; Torres N; Potter C; Brooks TJ; Coleman KJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Jul; 36(7):1244-51. PubMed ID: 15235333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of uniaxial accelerometry during activities of daily living in children.
Eisenmann JC; Strath SJ; Shadrick D; Rigsby P; Hirsch N; Jacobson L
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2004 Mar; 91(2-3):259-63. PubMed ID: 14569402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field.
Hendelman D; Miller K; Baggett C; Debold E; Freedson P
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):S442-9. PubMed ID: 10993413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children.
Puyau MR; Adolph AL; Vohra FA; Butte NF
Obes Res; 2002 Mar; 10(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 11886937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity, reliability, and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometer as a measure of physical activity.
Nichols JF; Morgan CG; Sarkin JA; Sallis JF; Calfas KJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1999 Jun; 31(6):908-12. PubMed ID: 10378921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity.
Bassett DR; Ainsworth BE; Swartz AM; Strath SJ; O'Brien WL; King GA
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):S471-80. PubMed ID: 10993417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children.
Trost SG; Ward DS; Moorehead SM; Watson PD; Riner W; Burke JR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1998 Apr; 30(4):629-33. PubMed ID: 9565947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Field evaluation of energy expenditure in women using Tritrac accelerometers.
Campbell KL; Crocker PR; McKenzie DC
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Oct; 34(10):1667-74. PubMed ID: 12370570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of EPOC adjustment on estimation of energy expenditure using activity monitors.
Pribyslavska V; Caputo JL; Coons JM; Barry VW
J Med Eng Technol; 2018 May; 42(4):265-273. PubMed ID: 29911930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Specific Activity Types.
Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Dickin DC; Montoye AH
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1619-28. PubMed ID: 27015387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of the SenseWear Armband to assess energy expenditure in graded walking.
Vernillo G; Savoldelli A; Pellegrini B; Schena F
J Phys Act Health; 2015 Feb; 12(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 24508986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ability of different physical activity monitors to detect movement during treadmill walking.
Leenders NY; Nelson TE; Sherman WM
Int J Sports Med; 2003 Jan; 24(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 12582951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparisons of four methods of estimating physical activity in adult women.
Leenders NYJM ; Sherman WM; Nagaraja HN
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Jul; 32(7):1320-6. PubMed ID: 10912900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of activity monitors worn at multiple nontraditional locations under controlled and free-living conditions in young adult women.
Kumahara H; Ayabe M; Ichibakase M; Tashima A; Chiwata M; Takashi T
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2015 May; 40(5):448-56. PubMed ID: 25832964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Wristband Activity Monitors during Ambulation and Activities.
Chen MD; Kuo CC; Pellegrini CA; Hsu MJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1942-9. PubMed ID: 27183123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors.
Lee JM; Kim Y; Welk GJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Sep; 46(9):1840-8. PubMed ID: 24777201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of Oura ring energy expenditure and steps in laboratory and free-living.
Kristiansson E; Fridolfsson J; Arvidsson D; Holmäng A; Börjesson M; Andersson-Hall U
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):50. PubMed ID: 36829120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]