206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10994220)
1. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: the resiliency of retrieval processes.
Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Perretta JG; Tonev ST
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):609-25. PubMed ID: 10994220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: further support for an asymmetry.
Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Guez J; Dori H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Sep; 24(5):1091-104. PubMed ID: 9747524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis.
Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Gavrilescu D; Anderson ND
Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):965-76. PubMed ID: 11105522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Divided attention in younger and older adults: effects of strategy and relatedness on memory performance and secondary task costs.
Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Guez J; Kreuger S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):520-37. PubMed ID: 15910135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do novel associative word stem completion and cued recall share the same memory retrieval processes?
Gooding PA; Mayes AR; van Eijk R; Meudell PR; MacDonald FL
Memory; 1999 May; 7(3):323-43. PubMed ID: 10659081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of ongoing task context and target typicality on prospective memory performance: the importance of associative cueing.
Nowinski JL; Dismukes KR
Memory; 2005 Aug; 13(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 16076678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Encoding specificity manipulations do affect retrieval from memory.
Zeelenberg R
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 May; 119(1):107-21. PubMed ID: 15823245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An asymmetry between memory encoding and retrieval. Revelation, generation, and transfer-appropriate processing.
Mulligan NW; Lozito JP
Psychol Sci; 2006 Jan; 17(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 16371137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Memory and attention: A double dissociation between memory encoding and memory retrieval.
Mulligan NW; Spataro P; West JT
Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105509. PubMed ID: 37354786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory.
Hicks JL; Marsh RL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1483-98. PubMed ID: 11185778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
Clarke AJ; Butler LT
Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.
Barnes KA; Dougherty MR
Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 17892083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks.
Kliegel M; Martin M; McDaniel MA; Einstein GO
Memory; 2004 Sep; 12(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 15615314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: a combined fMRI and divided-attention study.
Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 18275332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of division of attention during encoding and retrieval on age differences in episodic memory.
Nyberg L; Nilsson LG; Olofsson U; Bäckman L
Exp Aging Res; 1997; 23(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 9151074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding.
Pastötter B; Schicker S; Niedernhuber J; Bäuml KH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 21171804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Source memory and divided attention: reciprocal costs to primary and secondary tasks.
Troyer AK; Winocur G; Craik FI; Moscovitch M
Neuropsychology; 1999 Oct; 13(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 10527055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Divided attention at retrieval disrupts knowing but not remembering.
Knott LM; Dewhurst SA
Memory; 2007 Aug; 15(6):664-74. PubMed ID: 17654280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data.
Craik FIM; Eftekhari E; Binns MA
Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1263-1277. PubMed ID: 29934748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Encoding and retrieval during bimanual rhythmic coordination.
Shockley K; Turvey MT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):980-90. PubMed ID: 16248746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
