These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10994224)

  • 1. Memory-search and rehearsal processes and the word length effect in immediate recall: a synthesis in reply to service.
    Cowan N; Nugent LD; Elliott EM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):666-70. PubMed ID: 10994224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phonological complexity and word duration in immediate recall: different paradigms answer different questions. A comment on Cowan, Nugent, Elliott, and Geer.
    Service E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):661-5. PubMed ID: 10994223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is there a temporal basis of the word length effect? A response to Service (1998).
    Cowan N; Nugent LD; Elliott EM; Geer T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):647-60. PubMed ID: 10994222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution to immediate serial recall of rehearsal, search speed, access to lexical memory, and phonological coding: an investigation at the construct level.
    Tehan G; Fogarty G; Ryan K
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jul; 32(5):711-21. PubMed ID: 15552348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonological information in immediate and delayed sentence recall.
    Rummer R; Engelkamp J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jan; 56(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 12587896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The distinctiveness of the word-length effect.
    Hulme C; Neath I; Stuart G; Shostak L; Surprenant AM; Brown GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):586-94. PubMed ID: 16719668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rehearsal in serial recall: An unworkable solution to the nonexistent problem of decay.
    Lewandowsky S; Oberauer K
    Psychol Rev; 2015 Oct; 122(4):674-99. PubMed ID: 26437148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When does length cause the word length effect?
    Jalbert A; Neath I; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):338-53. PubMed ID: 21171805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eye movements and over rehearsal in wood recall.
    Geiselman RE; Bellezza FS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1977 May; 3(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 870611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonological short-term memory impairment and the word length effect in children with intellectual disabilities.
    Poloczek S; Büttner G; Hasselhorn M
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Feb; 35(2):455-62. PubMed ID: 24361814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word length and phonological similarity effects in simple, complex, and delayed serial recall tasks: implications for working memory.
    Tehan G; Hendry L; Kocinski D
    Memory; 2001; 9(4-6):333-48. PubMed ID: 11594356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forgetting in immediate serial recall: decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference?
    Oberauer K; Lewandowsky S
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jul; 115(3):544-76. PubMed ID: 18729591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of rehearsal activity and level of word processing on learning disabled and normal readers' free recall.
    Swanson L
    J Gen Psychol; 1983 Jan; 108(1st Half):61-72. PubMed ID: 6834018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Serial recall of poor readers in two presentation modalities: combined effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Irausquin RS; de Gelder B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Jun; 65(3):342-69. PubMed ID: 9178964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word length and articulatory suppression affect short-term and long-term recall tasks.
    Russo R; Grammatopoulou N
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jul; 31(5):728-37. PubMed ID: 12956237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of stimulus set size and word frequency on verbal serial recall.
    Roodenrys S; Quinlan PT
    Memory; 2000 Mar; 8(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 10829124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development of the use of long-term knowledge to assist short-term recall.
    Turner JE; Henry LA; Smith PT
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):457-78. PubMed ID: 10881614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-term memory capacity: magic number or magic spell?
    Schweickert R; Boruff B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Jul; 12(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 2942626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the effect of concurrent task performance.
    Bhatarah P; Ward G; Tan L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 16569142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the effects of list length and output order.
    Ward G; Tan L; Grenfell-Essam R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1207-41. PubMed ID: 20804293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.