123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10994279)
1. Low-cost technology for screening uterine cervical cancer.
Parashari A; Singh V; Sehgal A; Satyanarayana L; Sodhani P; Gupta MM
Bull World Health Organ; 2000; 78(8):964-7. PubMed ID: 10994279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early detection of cervical cancer through acetic acid application--an aided visual inspection.
Singh V; Sehgal A; Parashari A; Sodhani P; Satyanarayana L
Singapore Med J; 2001 Aug; 42(8):351-4. PubMed ID: 11764051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors.
Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK
Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Lugol's iodine (VILI), cervical cytology and HPV testing as cervical screening tools in Latin America. This report refers to partial results from the LAMS (Latin AMerican Screening) study.
Sarian LO; Derchain SF; Naud P; Roteli-Martins C; Longatto-Filho A; Tatti S; Branca M; Erzen M; Serpa-Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Bragança JF; Lima TP; Maeda MY; Lörincz A; Dores GB; Costa S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 16156945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of visual inspection of cervix and Pap smear for cervical cancer screening.
Tayyeb R; Khawaja NP; Malik N
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Apr; 13(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 12718787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct visual inspection of the cervix with Lugol iodine for the detection of premalignant lesions.
El-Shalakany AH; Saeed MM; Abdel-Aal MR; El-Nakeeb AH; Noseirat N; Ayyad SB; El Din ZS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Jul; 12(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 18596460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of a low cost magnifying device, Magnivisualizer, versus colposcope for detection of pre-cancer and cancerous lesions of uterine cervix.
Singh V; Parashari A; Gupta S; Sodhani P; Sehgal A
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 25142620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A study of cervical cancer screening for prevention of carcinoma cervix.
Christe DM; Mohanambal M; Ramamurthy V; Snehaa NB
J Indian Med Assoc; 2008 Dec; 106(12):779-80, 782. PubMed ID: 19370947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual inspection of the cervix as a primary means of cervical cancer screening: results of a pilot study.
Chirenje ZM; Chipato T; Kasule J; Rusakaniko S
Cent Afr J Med; 1999 Feb; 45(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 10444896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid in cervical cancer screening: a comparison with cervical cytology.
Akinola OI; Fabamwo AO; Oshodi YA; Banjo AA; Odusanya O; Gbadegesin A; Tayo A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 27(7):703-5. PubMed ID: 17999297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Downstaging of cervical cancer.
Ananth R
J Indian Med Assoc; 2000 Feb; 98(2):41-4. PubMed ID: 11016148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women.
Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of visual inspection and Papanicolau (PAP) smears for cervical cancer screening in Honduras: should PAP smears be abandoned?
Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Figueroa J; Simon CJ
Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Sep; 12(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 17875013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening.
Bentz JS
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2005 Nov; 5(6):857-71. PubMed ID: 16255628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cervical cancer screening and associated treatment costs in France].
Bergeron C; Breugelmans JG; Bouée S; Lorans C; Bénard S; Rémy V
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1036-42. PubMed ID: 17070085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The role of colposcopy in evaluation of the cervix for unexpectedly positive pap smears].
Jesień-Sokołowska U; Madej JG
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 10375918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual inspection for cervical cancer screening: evaluation by doctor versus paramedical worker.
Bhatla N; Mukhopadhyay A; Joshi S; Kumar A; Kriplani A; Pandey RM; Verma K
Indian J Cancer; 2004; 41(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15105577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
