These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10994336)

  • 1. [New diagnostic possibilities by a fully automatic applanation tonometer for the ophthalmologist. From the Goldmann principle to automated tonometry].
    Draeger J; Rumberger E
    Ophthalmologe; 2000 Aug; 97(8):571-3. PubMed ID: 10994336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Optimizing the automatic self-tonometer by an acoustic control signal and changed fixation optics].
    Draeger J; Groenhoff S; Hock B; Klemm M
    Ophthalmologe; 1993 Feb; 90(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 8443450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Self-tonometry--technical possibilities and clinical significance].
    Draeger J; Groenhoff S
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(6):688-91. PubMed ID: 2086419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry.
    Sandner D; Böhm A; Kostov S; Pillunat L
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 243(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15614540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [2 years self-tonometry. Acceptance and results].
    Deutsch C; Draeger J; Groenhoff S
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):489-92. PubMed ID: 1486265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Automatic measurement of intraocular pressure with an electronic sensor tonometer].
    Draeger J; Hechler B; Levedag S; Wirt H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Jun; 190(6):539-41. PubMed ID: 3626414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
    Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
    Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Progress in early detection and follow up of glaucoma].
    Draeger J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1989 Nov; 195(5):330-3. PubMed ID: 2601279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical comparison of the ProTon and Tono-Pen tonometers with the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Midelfart A; Wigers A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1994 Dec; 78(12):895-8. PubMed ID: 7819170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Investigation and manufacture of intellectualized tonometer bassed on the principle of linearly measuring the applanation area diameter of ocular cornea].
    Ma J; Xu D
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1998 Sep; 22(5):268-71. PubMed ID: 12078164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Physical technical calibration of a new self-tonometer].
    Draeger J; Wiezorrek R; Hock B; Gerhard E; Klemm M
    Ophthalmologe; 1993 Feb; 90(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 8443449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical calibration and in vitro evaluation of the validity of 2 microprocessor controlled tonometers].
    Deutsch C; Christiansen N; Ossysek I; Draeger J; Rumberger E; Kohlhaas M
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Oct; 93(5):544-8. PubMed ID: 9004877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diaton tonometry: an assessment of validity and preference against Goldmann tonometry.
    Doherty MD; Carrim ZI; O'Neill DP
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e171-5. PubMed ID: 21718408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Reproducibility of the results of two non-contact tonometers. Comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Gräf M; Hoffmann OF
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Jun; 200(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 1507794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Goldmann applanation tonometry free of the slitlamp.
    Cohan BE; Flanders Z; Pearch AC; Schork MA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 128(5):628-31. PubMed ID: 20457988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic contour tonometry: principle and use.
    Punjabi OS; Kniestedt C; Stamper RL; Lin SC
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 34(9):837-40. PubMed ID: 17181613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Portable tonometers: a clinical comparison of applanation and indentation devices.
    Chiara GF; Semes LP; Potter JW; Cutter GR; Tucker WR
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Feb; 60(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 2703651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
    Schlote T; Landenberger H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.