These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10994444)

  • 1. Peripheral refractive correction and automated perimetric profiles.
    Wild JM; Wood JM; Crews SJ
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1988 Jun; 66(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 10994444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of refractive correction on automated perimetric thresholds.
    Weinreb RN; Perlman JP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1986 Jun; 101(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 3717255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of uncorrected refractive errors upon central visual field testing.
    Henson DB; Morris EJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Oct; 13(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 8278184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of single vision soft contact lenses on peripheral refraction.
    Kang P; Fan Y; Oh K; Trac K; Zhang F; Swarbrick H
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):1014-21. PubMed ID: 22729170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of refraction accuracy on automated perimetric threshold measurements.
    Heuer DK; Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Gressel MG
    Ophthalmology; 1987 Dec; 94(12):1550-3. PubMed ID: 3431825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perimetric profiles and cortical representation.
    Wood JM; Wild JM; Drasdo N; Crews SJ
    Ophthalmic Res; 1986; 18(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 3808596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of refractive correction on the accuracy of frequency-doubling technology Matrix.
    Contestabile MT; Perdicchi A; Amodeo S; Paffetti L; Iester M; Recupero SM
    J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(5):413-5. PubMed ID: 23632396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of localized defocus on detection thresholds for different sized targets in the fovea and periphery.
    Anderson RS; McDowell DR; Ennis FA
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2001 Feb; 79(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 11167290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of contact lens power profile on peripheral refractive error.
    de la Jara PL; Sankaridurg P; Ehrmann K; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Jun; 91(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 24811847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of simulated light scattering on automated perimetric threshold measurements.
    Heuer DK; Anderson DR; Knighton RW; Feuer WJ; Gressel MG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Sep; 106(9):1247-51. PubMed ID: 3415549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of an automated refractor using a Hartmann-Shack sensor after corneal refractive surgery and cataract surgery.
    Park JH; Kim MJ; Park JH; Song IS; Kim JY; Tchah H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1889-97. PubMed ID: 26603398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alterations in the shape of the automated perimetric profile arising from cataract.
    Wood JM; Wild JM; Smerdon DL; Crews SJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1989; 227(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 2721985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Serial examination of the normal visual field using Octopus automated projection perimetry. Evidence for a learning effect.
    Wood JM; Wild JM; Hussey MK; Crews SJ
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1987 Jun; 65(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 3618158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of decreased retinal illumination on automated perimetric threshold measurements.
    Heuer DK; Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Gressel MG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 Dec; 108(6):643-50. PubMed ID: 2596543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of refractive blur on the detection sensitivity to light offsets in the central visual field.
    Mutlukan E
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1994 Apr; 72(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 8079624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Puptrak 1.0--a new semiautomated system for pupillometry with the Octopus perimeter: a preliminary report.
    Fankhauser F; Flammer J
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1989 Nov; 73(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 2700441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting the normal perimetric profile derived by automated static threshold LED perimetry. I. Pupil size.
    Wood JM; Wild JM; Bullimore MA; Gilmartin B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 2971152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of refractive error on automated global analysis program G-1.
    Goldstick BJ; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1987 Sep; 104(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 3631183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial summation and the cortical magnification of perimetric profiles.
    Wild JM; Wood JM; Flanagan JG
    Ophthalmologica; 1987; 195(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 3313151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [In kinetic perimetry high refractive errors also influence the isopter position outside the central 30 degrees].
    Niederhauser S; Mojon DS
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Apr; 219(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 12022001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.