These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10994444)

  • 21. Pupil shape as viewed along the horizontal visual field.
    Mathur A; Gehrmann J; Atchison DA
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 23648308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of Pharmacological Pupil Dilation on Dark-Adapted Perimetric Sensitivity in Healthy Subjects Using an Octopus 900 Perimeter.
    Igelman AD; Ku C; Mershon S; da Palma MM; McAnany JJ; Hyde RA; Park JC; Yang P; Pennesi ME
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Dec; 10(14):18. PubMed ID: 34919129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors influencing normal perimetric thresholds obtained using the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Herse PR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Mar; 33(3):611-7. PubMed ID: 1544786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Peripheral resolution and contrast sensitivity: effects of monochromatic and chromatic aberrations.
    Venkataraman AP; Papadogiannis P; Romashchenko D; Winter S; Unsbo P; Lundström L
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Apr; 36(4):B52-B57. PubMed ID: 31044955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Induced intraocular light scatter and the sensitivity gradient of the normal visual field.
    Wood JM; Wild JM; Crews SJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1987; 225(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 3311894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Pupillographic perimetry using the "Octopus"].
    Alexandridis E; Krastel H
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1989; 86(6):692-4. PubMed ID: 2625300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Peripheral motion detection and refractive error.
    Leibowitz HW; Johnson CA; Isabelle E
    Science; 1972 Sep; 177(4055):1207-8. PubMed ID: 5057628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Two-dimensional simulation of eccentric photorefraction images for ametropes: factors influencing the measurement.
    Wu Y; Thibos LN; Candy TR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Jul; 38(4):432-446. PubMed ID: 29736941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Open-loop accommodation in emmetropia and myopia.
    Strang NC; Gilmartin BS; Gray LS; Winfield NR; Winn B
    Curr Eye Res; 2000 Mar; 20(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 10694894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Monitoring and evaluation of refractive error and presbyopia for Vision 2020.
    Brian G; du Toit R; Ramke J; Palagyi A
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):249-54; quiz 327-9. PubMed ID: 20447120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of defocus on visual field measurement.
    Atchison DA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 3684281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Influence of Different OK Lens Designs on Peripheral Refraction.
    Kang P; Swarbrick H
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Sep; 93(9):1112-9. PubMed ID: 27232901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Small refractive errors--their correction and practical importance.
    Skrbek M; Petrová S
    Coll Antropol; 2013 Apr; 37 Suppl 1():209-16. PubMed ID: 23837246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Population-based assessment of sensitivity and specificity of a pinhole for detection of significant refractive errors in the community.
    Marmamula S; Keeffe JE; Narsaiah S; Khanna RC; Rao GN
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 24909916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Headache and refractive errors in children.
    Roth Z; Pandolfo KR; Simon J; Zobal-Ratner J
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2014; 51(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 24804974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Normal values of short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Mojon DS; Zulauf M
    Ophthalmologica; 2003; 217(4):260-4. PubMed ID: 12792131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of refractive error on pupillary dynamics in the normal and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) populations.
    Truong JQ; Joshi NR; Ciuffreda KJ
    J Optom; 2018; 11(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 28262507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument.
    Hays RD; Mangione CM; Ellwein L; Lindblad AS; Spritzer KL; McDonnell PJ
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2292-301. PubMed ID: 14644710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of accommodation on off-axis refractive errors in myopic eyes.
    Whatham A; Zimmermann F; Martinez A; Delgado S; de la Jara PL; Sankaridurg P; Ho A
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):14.1-13. PubMed ID: 19757953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.