BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10994921)

  • 1. Inertial effects on mechanically braked Wingate power calculations.
    Reiser RF; Broker JP; Peterson ML
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9):1660-4. PubMed ID: 10994921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correcting the Wingate test for changes in kinetic energy of the ergometer flywheel.
    Bassett DR
    Int J Sports Med; 1989 Dec; 10(6):446-9. PubMed ID: 2628365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standing and seated Wingate protocols in human cycling. A comparison of standard parameters.
    Reiser RF; Maines JM; Eisenmann JC; Wilkinson JG
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Nov; 88(1-2):152-7. PubMed ID: 12436284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the velotron racermate cycle ergometer to measure anaerobic power.
    Astorino TA; Cottrell T
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Mar; 33(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 22187386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lower Wingate Test Power Outcomes From "All-Out" Pretest Pedaling Cadence Compared With Moderate Cadence.
    Lunn WR; Zenoni MA; Crandall IH; Dress AE; Berglund ML
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2367-73. PubMed ID: 26200017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanically braked Wingate powers: agreement between SRM, corrected and conventional methods of measurement.
    Balmer J; Bird S; Davison RC; Doherty M; Smith P
    J Sports Sci; 2004 Jul; 22(7):661-7. PubMed ID: 15370497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of different calculation methods of flywheel parameters on the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Coleman SG; Hale T
    Can J Appl Physiol; 1998 Aug; 23(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 9677437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimized versus corrected peak power during friction-braked cycle ergometry in males and females.
    James DV; Wood DM; Maberly TC; De Ste Croix M
    J Sports Sci; 2007 Jun; 25(8):859-67. PubMed ID: 17474039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle ergometer: performance and energy cost of the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Micklewright D; Alkhatib A; Beneke R
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Apr; 96(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 16468058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of load on wingate test performances and reliability.
    Jaafar H; Rouis M; Coudrat L; Attiogbé E; Vandewalle H; Driss T
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3462-8. PubMed ID: 24936901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inertial-load method determines maximal cycling power in a single exercise bout.
    Martin JC; Wagner BM; Coyle EF
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1997 Nov; 29(11):1505-12. PubMed ID: 9372489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanically braked elliptical Wingate test: modification considerations, load optimization, and reliability.
    Ozkaya O; Colakoglu M; Kuzucu EO; Yildiztepe E
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1313-23. PubMed ID: 21904246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic calibration of mechanically, air- and electromagnetically braked cycle ergometers.
    Maxwell BF; Withers RT; Ilsley AH; Wakim MJ; Woods GF; Day L
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1998 Sep; 78(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 9754975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of inertia correction and resistive load on fatigue during repeated sprints on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer.
    Bogdanis G; Papaspyrou A; Lakomy H; Nevill M
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Nov; 26(13):1437-45. PubMed ID: 18923956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of Velotron chainring size on Wingate anaerobic test.
    Clark NW; Wagner DR; Heath EM
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Feb; 21(2):202-206. PubMed ID: 28807684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Monark Wingate ergometer by direct measurement of resistance and velocity.
    MacIntosh BR; Bryan SN; Rishaug P; Norris SR
    Can J Appl Physiol; 2001 Dec; 26(6):543-58. PubMed ID: 11842272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accurate assessment of work done and power during a Wingate anaerobic test.
    Franklin KL; Gordon RS; Baker JS; Davies B
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2007 Apr; 32(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 17486163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing peak cycling performance: effects of braking force during growth.
    Doré E; Bedu M; França NM; Diallo O; Duché P; Van Praagh E
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Feb; 32(2):493-8. PubMed ID: 10694137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of aerobic work and power on a rope-braked cycle ergometer by direct measurement.
    Gordon RS; Franklin KL; Baker JS; Davies B
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2006 Aug; 31(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 16900228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of hip orientation on Wingate power output and cycling technique.
    Reiser RF; Peterson ML; Broker JP
    J Strength Cond Res; 2002 Nov; 16(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 12423185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.