These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10996701)

  • 41. Development of antibody-carrying microbubbles based on clinically available ultrasound contrast agent for targeted molecular imaging: a preliminary chemical study.
    Otani K; Yamahara K
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2011 Apr; 13(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 20512420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Ultrasound, cavitation bubbles and their interaction with cells.
    Wu J; Nyborg WL
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2008 Jun; 60(10):1103-16. PubMed ID: 18468716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dynamic Behavior of Microbubbles during Long Ultrasound Tone-Burst Excitation: Mechanistic Insights into Ultrasound-Microbubble Mediated Therapeutics Using High-Speed Imaging and Cavitation Detection.
    Chen X; Wang J; Pacella JJ; Villanueva FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):528-538. PubMed ID: 26603628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Correlation Between Brain Tissue Damage and Inertial Cavitation Dose Quantified Using Passive Cavitation Imaging.
    Xu S; Ye D; Wan L; Shentu Y; Yue Y; Wan M; Chen H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 45(10):2758-2766. PubMed ID: 31378549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Gauging the likelihood of stable cavitation from ultrasound contrast agents.
    Bader KB; Holland CK
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jan; 58(1):127-44. PubMed ID: 23221109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Acoustic cavitation-based monitoring of the reversibility and permeability of ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening.
    Sun T; Samiotaki G; Wang S; Acosta C; Chen CC; Konofagou EE
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):9079-94. PubMed ID: 26562661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Bursting bubbles and bilayers.
    Wrenn SP; Dicker SM; Small EF; Dan NR; Mleczko M; Schmitz G; Lewin PA
    Theranostics; 2012; 2(12):1140-59. PubMed ID: 23382772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of Pulse Shaping on Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation In Vitro and In Vivo.
    Gupta I; Eisenbrey J; Stanczak M; Sridharan A; Dave JK; Liu JB; Hazard C; Wang X; Wang P; Li H; Wallace K; Forsberg F
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 27943411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Bioeffects of positive and negative acoustic pressures in mice infused with microbubbles.
    Dalecki D; Child SZ; Raeman CH; Xing C; Gracewski S; Carstensen EL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Oct; 26(8):1327-32. PubMed ID: 11120371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Correlation of ultrasound-induced hemolysis with cavitation detector output in vitro.
    Everbach EC; Makin IR; Azadniv M; Meltzer RS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 9232771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Simplified Preparation of α
    Otani K; Nishimura H; Kamiya A; Harada-Shiba M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 May; 44(5):1063-1073. PubMed ID: 29501282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Spatial control of gas bubbles and their effects on acoustic fields.
    Lo AH; Kripfgans OD; Carson PL; Fowlkes JB
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 32(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 16364801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Ambient pressure sensitivity of microbubbles investigated through a parameter study.
    Andersen KS; Jensen JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3350-8. PubMed ID: 20000949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Italian Society of Cardiovascular Echography (SIEC) Consensus Conference on the state of the art of contrast echocardiography.
    Ital Heart J; 2004 Apr; 5(4):309-34. PubMed ID: 15185894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Activation of microbubbles by short-pulsed ultrasound enhances the cytotoxic effect of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) in a canine thyroid adenocarcinoma cell line in vitro.
    Sasaki N; Kudo N; Nakamura K; Lim SY; Murakami M; Kumara WR; Tamura Y; Ohta H; Yamasaki M; Takiguchi M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 38(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 22104534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of acoustic parameters on the cavitation behavior of SonoVue microbubbles induced by pulsed ultrasound.
    Lin Y; Lin L; Cheng M; Jin L; Du L; Han T; Xu L; Yu ACH; Qin P
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2017 Mar; 35(Pt A):176-184. PubMed ID: 27707644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Encapsulated contrast microbubble radial oscillation associated with postexcitation pressure peaks.
    Santin MD; King DA; Foiret J; Haak A; O'Brien WD; Bridal SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1156-64. PubMed ID: 20136236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sonoporation based on repeated vaporization of gold nanodroplets.
    Liu WW; Ko HC; Li PC
    Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2761-2773. PubMed ID: 35172015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A real-time controller for sustaining thermally relevant acoustic cavitation during ultrasound therapy.
    Hockham N; Coussios CC; Arora M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Dec; 57(12):2685-94. PubMed ID: 21156364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Mechanism of hepatic parenchyma-specific contrast of microbubble-based contrast agent for ultrasonography: microscopic studies in rat liver.
    Watanabe R; Matsumura M; Munemasa T; Fujimaki M; Suematsu M
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Sep; 42(9):643-51. PubMed ID: 17700280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.