These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10996762)

  • 1. Evaluation of two new soft contact lenses for correction of presbyopia: the Focus Progressives multifocal and the Acuvue Bifocal.
    Fisher K; Bauman E; Schwallie J
    Int Contact Lens Clin; 2000 Jul; 26(4):92-103. PubMed ID: 10996762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.
    Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens.
    Guillon M; Maissa C; Cooper P; Girard-Claudon K; Poling TR
    CLAO J; 2002 Apr; 28(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 12054378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual Performance of Daily-disposable Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
    Sha J; Tilia D; Kho D; Amrizal H; Diec J; Yeotikar N; Jong M; Thomas V; Bakaraju RC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1096-1104. PubMed ID: 30451806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of add power on distance vision with the acuvue bifocal contact lens.
    Ardaya D; DeVuono G; Lin I; Neutgens A; Bergenske P; Caroline P; Smythe J
    Optometry; 2004 Mar; 75(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 15058698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Bifocal contact lenses as a correction method in presbyopia].
    Avetisov SE; Rybakova EG; Egorova GB; Churkina MN; Borodina NV; Boev VI
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2003; 119(4):28-31. PubMed ID: 12934502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 2. Visual performance after 1 week of lens wear.
    Bakaraju RC; Tilia D; Sha J; Diec J; Chung J; Kho D; Delaney S; Munro A; Thomas V
    J Optom; 2018; 11(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 28619486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is binocular contrast sensitivity at distance compromised with multifocal soft contact lenses used to correct presbyopia?
    Soni PS; Patel R; Carlson RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):505-14. PubMed ID: 12858086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast visual acuity with bifocal contact lenses.
    Ueda K; Inagaki Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 17496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective clinical evaluation of the Acuvue Bifocal contact lens.
    Key JE; Yee JL
    CLAO J; 1999 Oct; 25(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 10555737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses.
    Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Jan; 34(1):8-29. PubMed ID: 24205890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peripheral refraction and spherical aberration profiles with single vision, bifocal and multifocal soft contact lenses.
    Fedtke C; Ehrmann K; Bakaraju RC
    J Optom; 2020; 13(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 30772211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual performance with multifocal contact lenses and progressive addition spectacles.
    Fogt JS; Weisenberger K; Fogt N
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2022 Aug; 45(4):101472. PubMed ID: 34049808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-term visual performance of soft multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Sha J; Bakaraju RC; Tilia D; Chung J; Delaney S; Munro A; Ehrmann K; Thomas V; Holden BA
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2016 Apr; 79(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 27224066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Extended Depth-of-Focus Prototype Contact Lenses With the 1-Day ACUVUE MOIST MULTIFOCAL After One Week of Wear.
    Sha J; Tilia D; Kho D; Diec J; Thomas V; Bakaraju RC
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2():S157-S163. PubMed ID: 29023311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.