These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10997039)

  • 1. Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible.
    Takeda Y; Yagi A
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):927-34. PubMed ID: 10997039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inhibitory tagging in an interrupted visual search.
    Thomas LE; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1241-50. PubMed ID: 19633340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibitory tagging in visual search: a failure to replicate.
    Wolfe JM; Pokorny CW
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 2243759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inhibitory tagging in visual search: only in difficult search are items tagged individually.
    Hulleman J
    Vision Res; 2010 Sep; 50(20):2069-79. PubMed ID: 20673776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhibitory tagging on randomly moving objects.
    Ogawa H; Takeda Y; Yagi A
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Mar; 13(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 11933995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return.
    Vivas AB; Fuentes LJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 11495120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No need for inhibitory tagging of locations in visual search.
    Hulleman J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 19145020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prioritization in visual search: visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search.
    Olivers CN; Humphreys GW; Heinke D; Cooper AC
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 May; 64(4):540-60. PubMed ID: 12132757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postattentive vision.
    Wolfe JM; Klempen N; Dahlen K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):693-716. PubMed ID: 10811170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: inhibition of return.
    Müller HJ; von Mühlenen A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Oct; 26(5):1591-605. PubMed ID: 11039487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of return to occluded objects.
    Yi DJ; Kim MS; Chun MM
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1222-30. PubMed ID: 14710957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.
    Kwak HW; Egeth H
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):455-64. PubMed ID: 1594435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search.
    Kunar MA; Flusberg S; Wolfe JM
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):314-28. PubMed ID: 18372752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search.
    Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):851-61. PubMed ID: 19275913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition of return and visual search: how many separate loci are inhibited?
    Snyder JJ; Kingstone A
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):452-8. PubMed ID: 10909236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implicit learning of ignored visual context.
    Jiang Y; Leung AW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 15948286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks.
    Pratt J; Abrams RA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Feb; 25(1):229-42. PubMed ID: 10069033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Jan; 104(1):90-122. PubMed ID: 9009881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Object-based representations facilitate memory for inhibitory processes.
    Paul MA; Tipper SP
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Feb; 148(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 12541139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An unbinding problem? The disintegration of visible, previously attended objects does not attract attention.
    Wolfe JM; Oliva A; Butcher SJ; Arsenio HC
    J Vis; 2002; 2(3):256-71. PubMed ID: 12678587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.