These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10997043)

  • 41. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search.
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 20424053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Local processes in preattentive feature detection.
    Bacon WF; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 1826324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Salience is only briefly represented: evidence from probe-detection performance.
    Donk M; Soesman L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):286-302. PubMed ID: 20364919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A paradoxical exposure-duration effect in the Stroop task: temporal segregation between stimulus attributes facilitates selection.
    La Heij W; van der Heijden AH; Plooij P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):622-32. PubMed ID: 11424649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
    Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference.
    Kumada T
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jan; 61(1):61-79. PubMed ID: 10070200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Inhibition of return for target discriminations: the effect of repeating discriminated and irrelevant stimulus dimensions.
    Taylor TL; Donnelly MP
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Feb; 64(2):292-317. PubMed ID: 12013382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Understanding priming of color-singleton search: roles of attention at encoding and "retrieval".
    Goolsby BA; Suzuki S
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):929-44. PubMed ID: 11578055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Event-based prospective memory for poorly attended events.
    Cohen-Servi A; Meiran N; Kessler Y
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 17176662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Neural correlates of attentional capture in visual search.
    de Fockert J; Rees G; Frith C; Lavie N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 16(5):751-9. PubMed ID: 15200703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Attending to an object's color entails attending to its location: support for location-special views of visual attention.
    Tsal Y; Lamy D
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):960-8. PubMed ID: 10997042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Parallel processing in a multifeature whole-report paradigm.
    Kyllingsbaek S; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):64-82. PubMed ID: 17311480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.
    Muller HJ; Reimann B; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1021-35. PubMed ID: 14585020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. What you see is what you get: functional equivalence of a perceptually filled-in surface and a physically presented stimulus.
    Lleras A; Moore CM
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Oct; 17(10):876-81. PubMed ID: 17100788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.
    Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Aug; 50(2):184-93. PubMed ID: 1945740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Visual marking: evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):471-81. PubMed ID: 10909238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Activation and inhibition of stimulus features in conjunction search.
    Koshino H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):294-300. PubMed ID: 11495117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Localized attentional interference affects object individuation, not feature detection.
    McCarley JS; Mounts JR
    Perception; 2007; 36(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 17357703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Distractor filtering in media multitaskers.
    Cain MS; Mitroff SR
    Perception; 2011; 40(10):1183-92. PubMed ID: 22308888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.