These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The role of the angle components in the wings-in and wings-out forms of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Predebon J Perception; 1996; 25(7):773-81. PubMed ID: 8923548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The many illusions of the Müller-Lyer: comparisons of the wings-in and wings-out illusions and manipulations of standard and dot forms. Greist-Bousquet S; Schiffman HR Perception; 1981; 10(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 7279543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Length illusion in fractional Müller-Lyer stimuli: an object-perception approach. Redding GM; Hawley E Perception; 1993; 22(7):819-28. PubMed ID: 8115239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inaccurate feedback and performance on the Müller-Lyer illusion. Brosvic GM; Finizio S Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 1):896-8. PubMed ID: 7567409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selective looking and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the effect of changes in the focus of attention on the Müller-Lyer illusion. Goryo K; Robinson JO; Wilson JA Perception; 1984; 13(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 6543943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of gap size between shaft and fins and of angle of fins on the Müller--Lyer illusion. Pressey AW; Di Lollo V; Tait RW Perception; 1977; 6(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 917731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of length-matching and length-fractionation measures of Müller-lyer distortions. Predebon J Percept Psychophys; 2005 Feb; 67(2):264-73. PubMed ID: 15971690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Müller-Lyer illusion and perception of numerosity. Agostini T; Luccio R Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Jun; 78(3 Pt 1):937-8. PubMed ID: 8084714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Control stimuli in investigations of the acute-angled and obtuse-angled Müller-Lyer illusions. Adam J; Bateman L Perception; 1980; 9(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 7422463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. More thoughts on perceiving and grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion. Otto-de Haart EG; Carey DP; Milne AB Neuropsychologia; 1999 Dec; 37(13):1437-44. PubMed ID: 10617263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Size and direction of distortion in geometric-optical illusions: conciliation between the Müller-Lyer and Titchener configurations. Nemati F Perception; 2009; 38(11):1585-600. PubMed ID: 20120258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An explanation for the Müller-Lyer illusion. Davies TN; Spencer J Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):219-24. PubMed ID: 905080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of the ability to form mental images in Müller-Lyer optical illusions. Pérez-Fabello MJ; Campos A Perception; 2023 Aug; 52(8):576-589. PubMed ID: 37384424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information. Predebon J Exp Brain Res; 2005 May; 163(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 15654590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of changes in fin-length on apparent shaft-length and depth in the Müller-Lyer illusion. Jaeger T Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Aug; 41(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1178436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used. Foster RM; Franz VH Perception; 2014; 43(8):783-95. PubMed ID: 25549508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]