These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10997053)

  • 1. Effects of differences in timbre on sequential grouping.
    Cusack R; Roberts B
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):1112-20. PubMed ID: 10997053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual organization of complex-tone sequences: a tradeoff between pitch and timbre?
    Singh PG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Sep; 82(3):886-99. PubMed ID: 3655122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laterality in the perception of temporal cues of musical timbre.
    Brancucci A; San Martini P
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Dec; 37(13):1445-51. PubMed ID: 10617264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate.
    Grimault N; Bacon SP; Micheyl C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1340-8. PubMed ID: 11931311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre.
    Krumhansl CL; Iverson P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):739-51. PubMed ID: 1500873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones.
    Singh PG; Hirsh IJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Nov; 92(5):2650-61. PubMed ID: 1479128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rhythmic masking release: effects of asynchrony, temporal overlap, harmonic relations, and source separation on cross-spectral grouping.
    Turgeon M; Bregman AS; Roberts B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):939-953. PubMed ID: 16262490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid Adaptation to the Timbre of Natural Sounds.
    Piazza EA; Theunissen FE; Wessel D; Whitney D
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13826. PubMed ID: 30218053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of rhythm and melody on auditory stream segregation.
    Szalárdy O; Bendixen A; Böhm TM; Davies LA; Denham SL; Winkler I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1392-405. PubMed ID: 24606277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory stream segregation and the perception of across-frequency synchrony.
    Micheyl C; Hunter C; Oxenham AJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Aug; 36(4):1029-1039. PubMed ID: 20695716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward a neurophysiological theory of auditory stream segregation.
    Snyder JS; Alain C
    Psychol Bull; 2007 Sep; 133(5):780-99. PubMed ID: 17723030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual organization of complex auditory sequences: effect of number of simultaneous subsequences and frequency separation.
    Brochard R; Drake C; Botte MC; McAdams S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1742-1759. PubMed ID: 10641316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of the adaptive music perception test.
    Kirchberger MJ; Russo FA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 25350404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preparation of stimuli for timbre perception studies.
    Labuschagne IB; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2256-67. PubMed ID: 23967955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband.
    Roberts B; Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Nov; 112(5 Pt 1):2074-85. PubMed ID: 12430819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processing of short auditory stimuli: the rapid audio sequential presentation paradigm (RASP).
    Suied C; Agus TR; Thorpe SJ; Pressnitzer D
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():443-51. PubMed ID: 23716251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Pitch and Timbre Cues on Auditory Grouping and Stream Segregation.
    Oh Y; Zuwala JC; Salvagno CM; Tilbrook GA
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():725093. PubMed ID: 35087369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Active stream segregation specifically involves the left human auditory cortex.
    Deike S; Scheich H; Brechmann A
    Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 265(1-2):30-7. PubMed ID: 20233603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.